1. INTRODUCTION
⌅The
concrete prism test (CPT) is one approach used to assess the potential
for an alkali-silica reaction (ASR) of a given mix design. As such, it
is an important tool in designing concrete resistant to ASR. However,
the transferability of the results obtained with accelerated tests to
concrete behaviour under field conditions has to be validated. A
validation of the Swiss CPT and the transferability of its results to
concrete structures have been established in (11.
Leemann, A.; Merz, C. (2013) An attempt to validate the
ultra-accelerated microbar and the concrete performance test with the
degree of AAR-induced damage observed in concrete structures. Cem. Concr. Res. 49, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.03.014.
).
However, only concrete produced with Portland cement (CEM I) was used
in this validation. Supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) are
increasingly used for concrete production either to reduce cement
clinker content and with it CO2 emissions or as a way to
mitigate ASR. Nowadays, blended cements dominate the Swiss cement
market. So far, the transferability of the results of the CPT to
concrete in field conditions has not been validated for mix designs
containing SCM in Switzerland. Internationally, some information is
provided by current field exposure sites where concrete blocks produced
in the laboratory are stored outdoors. Their expansion is surveyed and
compared to results of the CPT (2-62.
Thomas, M.; Fournier, B.; Folliard, K.J.; Ideker, J.; Shehata, M.
(2006) Test methods for evaluating preventive measures for controlling
expansion due to alkali-silica reaction in concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 36 [10], 1842-1856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.01.014.
3.
Fournier, B.; Ideker, J.H.; Folliard, K.J.; Thomas, M.D.A.;
Nkinamubanzi, P-C.; Chevrier, R. (2009) Effect of environmental
conditions on expansion in concrete due to alkali-silica reaction (ASR). Mater. Charact. 60 [7], 669-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2008.12.018.
4.
Ideker, J.H.; Drimalas, T.; Bentivegna, A.F.; Folliard, K.J.; Fournier,
B.; Thomas, M.D.A.; Hooton, R.D.; Rogers, C.A. (2012) The importance of
outdoor exposure site testing. In: Proceedings of the 14th
International Conference on Alkali Aggregate Reactions (ICAAR), Austin,
Texas.
5. Fournier, B.; Chevrier, R.; Bilodeau, A.; Nkinamubanzi,
P.C.; Bouzoubaa, N. (2016) Comparative field and laboratory
investigations on the use of supplementary cementing materials (SCMs) to
control alkali-silica reaction (ASR) in concrete. In: Proceedings of
the 15th International Conference on Alkali Aggregate Reactions (ICAAR),
Sao Paolo, Brasil.
6. Wigum, B.J.; Einarsson, G.J. (2016) Alkali
aggregate reaction in Iceland: results from laboratory testing compared
to field exposure site. In: Proceedings of the 15th International
Conference on Alkali Aggregate Reactions (ICAAR), Sao Paolo, Brasil.
).
However, these studies cover only the behaviour of the specific
aggregate-binder combinations used. As every reactive aggregate exhibits
a characteristic behaviour in regard to expansion and as the cement
composition and its effect on ASR can vary substantially, a validation
of the CPT with Swiss materials is mandatory for a validation.
Therefore, a project using a similar approach as in (11.
Leemann, A.; Merz, C. (2013) An attempt to validate the
ultra-accelerated microbar and the concrete performance test with the
degree of AAR-induced damage observed in concrete structures. Cem. Concr. Res. 49, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.03.014.
)
was started. Structures were identified where two prerequisites were
present. Firstly, the concrete mix design had to include reactive
aggregates, fly ash (FA), silica fume (SF) or a combination of both SCM.
Secondly, results of the CPT conducted at the time of construction had
to be available. Eight structures fulfilling the criteria described
above were identified. The goal of the project was to verify:
-
whether FA and SF have the same effect on ASR in the CPT on the short term and on the structures on the long term;
-
whether the expansion reached in the CPT shows a relation to eventual damages observed in the structures.
The
selected structures were inspected, coring sites were defined and
several cores were extracted. The concrete was analyzed using optical
microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with
energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Then the determined degree
of damage was compared to the expansion obtained in the CPT. More
detailed results than presented here are available in (77. Merz, C.; Leemann, A. (2019) AAR-Prävention für Beton: Erfahrungen mit Zusatzstoffen, Bericht VSS Nr. 694, Bern.
).
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
⌅2.1. Materials
⌅All investigated structures were built between 1999 and 2007, translating to an age of 11 to 17 years when this analysis was performed. Information about the structure type, age and location, the used concrete mix design, the alkali content of the concrete, the results of the CPT and reactivity of the aggregates are given in Table 1. All accelerated ASR tests were conducted once for each structure before construction. Consequently, cement, SCM and aggregates for the CPT were not from the same batch as used for the structures but from the same plants and quarries, respectively. Additionally, the mix designs in the CPT and the corresponding structures were identical.
Type of structure Year of construction |
Concrete mix design | Alkali-content of concrete [kg Na2Oeq/m3] | Expansion CPT | Origin of aggregate Expansion microbar test |
---|---|---|---|---|
River dam (Wettingen (AG), 1930-1933, repair 2005-2007) | CEM I 340 kg/m3 FA 50 kg/m3 SF 20 kg/m3 w/ceq = 0.45 |
3.1 kg/m3 | -0.003 ‰ after 8 month | Alluvial gravel Middleland 2.35 ‰ |
Viaduct (Dangelstutz (BE), 1999-2000) |
CEM II/A-LL 305 kg/m3 FA 20 kg/m3 w/ceq = 0.49 |
2.3 kg/m3 | 0.049 ‰ after 5 month3 | Gravel of Bernese Alps 1.97 ‰ |
Bridge 1 (Fully (VS), 2004-2006) | CEM I 300 kg/m3 FA 100 kg/m3 w/ceq = 0.42 |
2.6 kg/m3 | 0.122 ‰ after 5 month | Alluvial gravel of Rhone valley 2.50 ‰ |
Oil-water basin (Vevey (VD), 2005) | CEM I (with 4 mass-% SF) 350 kg/m3 FA 50 kg/m3 w/ceq = 0.46 |
3.0 kg/m3 | 0.161 ‰ after 12 month | Alluvial gravel of Rhone valley 1.89 ‰ |
Various components of Subway (Lausanne (VD), 2004-2007) | CEM I 350 kg/m3 FA 25 kg/m3 w/ceq = 0.46 |
3.2 kg/m3 | 0.171 ‰ after 5 month | Alluvial gravel of Middleland 0.95 und 1.61 ‰ |
Bridge 2 (Visp (VS), 2004-2006) | CEM I 325 kg/m3 SF 20 kg/m3 w/ceq = 0.45 |
2.6 kg/m3 | 0.259 ‰ after 18 month | Alluvial gravel of Vispa No data |
Train station (Salgesch (VS), 2004 | CEM I 270 kg/m3 FA 80 kg/m3 w/ceq = 0.48 |
2.6 kg/m3 | 0.265 ‰ after 5 month | Alluvial gravel of Rhone valley 1.79 ‰ |
Tunnel entrance (Collombey (VS), 2003 | CEM I ca. 350 kg/m3 SF + FA < 50 kg/m3 w/ceq ca. 0.44 |
3.1 kg/m3 | 0.300 ‰ after 5 month | Alluvial gravel of Rhone valley 2.04 ‰ |
The aggregates were tested with the ultra-accelerated microbar test according to AFNOR XP 18-594 (four prisms: 10 x 10 x 40 mm3 (88. AFNOR XP 18-594 (2004) Méthodes d’essai de reactivité aux alcalis. Association Française de Normalisation, Paris.
)).
The limit value of expansion to identify potentially reactive
aggregates is 0.11 %. Consequently, all aggregates used for the
investigated structures were classified as potentially reactive (Table 1).
The CPT as used nowadays in Switzerland (99. SN 505 262/1 (2019) Betonbau - Ergänzende Festlegungen. Appendix G. Schweizer Ingenieur- und Architektenverein, Zürich.
)
was not standardized before 2012. Therefore, there were some variations
in the CPT protocol used for the concrete mixtures in the early 2000’s.
All the concrete mixtures except one (the viaduct in Dangelstutz BE)
were boosted with NaOH corresponding to 25 mass-% of the total alkali
content of the concrete. The specimens (three prisms: 70 x 70 x 280 mm3)
were stored in a reactor at a temperature of 60 °C and close to 100 %
relative humidity. Test duration varied between 5 and 18 months. In the
early 2000’s, a general limit value of 0.2 ‰ was applied to distinguish
between ASR resistant concrete mixtures and non ASR-resistant concrete
mixtures. In spite of the fact that two concrete mixtures expanded more
than 0.2 ‰, they were still used for construction. In the current
standard (11.
Leemann, A.; Merz, C. (2013) An attempt to validate the
ultra-accelerated microbar and the concrete performance test with the
degree of AAR-induced damage observed in concrete structures. Cem. Concr. Res. 49, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.03.014.
), the limit values of expansion after 5 months and after 12 months are 0.2 and 0.3 ‰, respectively.
After defining coring sites, cores with a diameter of 50 mm and varying length were extracted. Samples for the production of thin sections were selected, cut, dried in the oven at 50 °C for three days and epoxy impregnated. Then thin section measuring 50 × 90 mm2 were produced. The samples to be studied in the SEM were prepared in the same way as the samples for thin sections. After epoxy impregnation, disc-shaped, polished samples with a diameter of 50 mm were produced and carbon coated for SEM analysis.
2.2. Methods
⌅The state of the structures was assessed by visual inspection. Narrow cracks (< 0.5 mm) were usually present on the concrete surface of the investigated structures. However, the extent of cracking was too low for the determination of a meaningful crack-index.
2-4 thin sections (50 × 90 mm2)
per structure were studied using a Zeiss Axioplan polarisation
microscope. The crack-index was determined using the approach described
in (1010.
Leemann, A.; Griffa, M. (2013) Diagnosis of alkali- aggregate reaction
in dams, state of the art report, SFOE-Project SI/500863-01, Bern.
), taking into account micro cracks ≥ 5 µm. 2-8 thin sections were studied per structure by optical microscopy.
The polished samples were studied using a FEI Quanta 650 applying a pressure between 3.0 and 4.0×10−6 Torr. Chemical analysis was performed by EDS with a Thermo Noran Ultra Dry 60 mm2 detector and Pathfinder X-Ray Microanalysis Software. An acceleration voltage of 12.0 kV and a spot size of 4.5 was used for imaging and EDS analysis. The images were acquired in the backscattering mode. Two disc-shaped polished sections with a diameter of 50 mm were studied per coring site. Element ratios are given based on atomic-%.
3. RESULTS
⌅3.1 River dam
⌅The presence of FA and SF and the type of cement used are confirmed (nominal binder composition: cement (CEM I (340 kg/m3), FA (50 kg/m3) and SF (20 kg/m3). The aggregates represent the typical material used in the Swiss Middleland, consisting of alluvial deposits of well-rounded carbonate and silicate rocks originating from the Alps.
The FA particles are easily identified. SF was poorly dispersed and forms a lot of agglomerates up to a diameter of 0.4 mm, displaying crack formation (Figure 1A). The high Ca/Si-ratio in the interior of the aggregate indicates that it has fully reacted and has no expansion potential left (Figure 1B).
Some of the cracks display the typical characteristics of early age shrinkage, propagating around aggregate particles instead of through them. At a depth > 4 cm, the cracks start to run through the aggregates. Some of them display ettringite. Ettringite is present as well in many air voids.
The total crack-index is 0.53 mm/m; without taking into account cracks < 5 µm it is 0.15 mm/m.
ASR products in the aggregates are nearly absent. Only in one aggregate, a thin crack lining, albeit too narrow for accurate EDS analysis, was present.
3.2. Viaduct
⌅The type of cement used and the presence of a minor amount of FA are confirmed (nominal binder composition: CEM II/A-LL 305 kg/m3, FA 20 kg/m3). The well-rounded aggregates are composed of granite and siliceous sandstone with minor amounts of limestone and gneiss. There are numerous microcracks in the aggregates, mainly concentrating on granite and gneiss. Usually, these microcracks do not extend into the cement paste and it is likely that these cracks were already present before the aggregates were used for concrete production However, in a few cases cracks extend from sandstone aggregates into the cement paste. In some of these cracks, crystalline ASR products are present as partial fillings. Only in one case, a completely filled crack is observed. The crack-index is 0.46 mm/m.
3.3. Bridge 1
⌅The presence of a major amount of FA (Figure 2) and the use of CEM I are confirmed (nominal binder composition: CEM I 300 kg/m3, FA 100 kg/m3). Gneiss and schists are the major components of the aggregates with about 30 % carbonates. Microcrystalline quartz as a typical reactive mineral is present both in gneiss and schist.
Typical ASR-related cracks extending from the aggregates into the cement paste are only marginally present. No ASR products in the aggregates are detectable in the thin sections. In the SEM, minor amounts of crystalline ASR products can be observed.
3.4. Oil-water basin
⌅Cement type and FA as mineral addition are confirmed (nominal binder composition: CEM I containing 4 mass-% of SF as minor constituent 350 kg/m3, FA 50 kg/m3). Some silica agglomerates with a diameter of up to 30 µm are present. The aggregates contain limestone, limestone with detritic silicates, quartzite, sandstone, gneiss and schist. The particles range from well-rounded to crushed.
The aggregates display numerous microcracks that often extend into the cement paste. No ASR can optically be identified in the thin sections.
In the majority of the aggregates, ASR products are observed in the SEM. They mostly occur as isolated bundles but can fill cracks entirely in a few cases (Figure 3).
The determination of the crack-index resulted in a value of 0.30 mm/m.
3.5. Subway
⌅Cores from three structures, all part of the subway line, were studied. The same concrete mix design was used in all three of them. The minor amount of FA and the cement type are confirmed (nominal binder composition: CEM I 350 kg/m3, FA 25 kg/m3). Limestone (70 %) with a minor amount of siliceous inclusions and sandstone (30 %) with minor amounts of silicates compose the well-rounded aggregate. A relatively alkali-reactive filler (crushed siliceous sandstones) was added to the concrete.
Two of the three structures do not show any signs of ASR. Both of them are not exposed to the weather and are not in contact with bedrock. However, in the third one, a supporting wall exposed to precipitation, clear signs of ASR are present. They manifest as microcracks extending from the aggregates into the cement paste. While the resolution of the optical microscope does not allow the identification of ASR products, they are identifiable in the SEM as partial crack fillings in limestones containing siliceous inclusions and in silicates.
The crack-index is 0.52 mm/m in the ASR-affected supporting wall.
3.6. Bridge 2
⌅The cement type and SF occasionally forming agglomerates < 20 µm are confirmed (nominal binder composition: CEM I 325 kg/m3, SF 20 kg/m3). The well-rounded aggregates mainly consist of gneiss and schist with traces of carbonate particles (~ 5 %).
There are numerous aggregates displaying microcracks extending into the cement paste. No ASR products can be observed in the thin sections. SEM reveals that crystalline ASR products are present as partial crack fillings.
A value of 0.42 mm/m was determined for the crack-index.
3.7. Railway station
⌅The use of a substantial amount of FA and the cement type are confirmed (nominal binder composition: CEM I 270 kg/m3, FA 80 kg/m3). The crushed aggregate consist of gneiss and schist with some carbonates corresponding to about 20 %.
Numerous aggregate particles exhibit ASR-typical cracks running from the aggregates into the cement paste. The cracks form an interconnected network comprising the entire concrete. However, no ASR products are recognizable by optical microscopy. In the majority of the affected aggregates, ASR products are identifiable with SEM as partial crack fillings (Figure 4). The crack-index is 0.43 mm/m.
3.8. Tunnel entrance
⌅The cement type and minor amounts of FA and SF, the latter with some agglomerates < 30 µm, are confirmed (nominal binder composition: CEM I 300-350 kg/m3, FA 20-40 kg/m3, SF 10 kg/m3). A mixture of silicate and carbonate rocks (~30 %) were used as aggregates.
Only about 5% of the aggregates display cracks running from the aggregates into the cement paste. In a few of these aggregates, ASR products can be observed by optical microscopy. Additionally, there are ASR products in air voids located in the cement paste. With the SEM, all crack-affected aggregates show partial or complete crack fillings.
The determination of the crack-index reveals a value of 0.48 mm/m.
3.9. Composition of ASR products
⌅The
crystalline ASR products present in aggregates consist of silicon as
the main components and additionally potassium, sodium and calcium
showing only little variation in the different structures (Figure 5).
Only the products formed in aggregates of bridge 1 contain slightly
less alkalis and calcium compared to the other ones. The Na/K-ratio
ranges from 0.20 to 0.48. These values may be influenced by releasable
alkalis of some aggregates or the alkalis present in the used FA, both
potentially affecting the Na/K-ratio. These values are in agreement with
results reported in (11.
Leemann, A.; Merz, C. (2013) An attempt to validate the
ultra-accelerated microbar and the concrete performance test with the
degree of AAR-induced damage observed in concrete structures. Cem. Concr. Res. 49, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.03.014.
, 11-1311.
Thaulow, N.; Jakobsen, U.H.; Clark, B. (1996) Composition of alkali
silica gel and ettringite in concrete railroad ties: SEM-EDX and X-ray
diffraction analyses. Cem. Concr. Res. 26 [2], 309-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(95)00219-7.
12.
Katayama, T.; Drimalas T.; Ideker J.H.; Fournier B. (2012) ASR gels and
their crystalline phases in concrete - universal products in
alkali-silica, alkali-silicate and alkali-carbonate reactions. In
Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Alkali Aggregate
Reactions (ICAAR), Austin, Texas (pp. 20-25).
13. Leemann, A.; Shi,
Z.; Wyrzykowski, M.; Winnefeld, F. (2020) Moisture stability of
crystalline alkali-silica reaction products formed in concrete exposed
to natural environment. Mater. Design. 195, 109066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109066.
).
4. DISCUSSION
⌅At the time of the investigation, the structures were still relatively recent for the development of ASR, since Swiss aggregates are known for their slow reaction. Still, the microstructural features present permit to assess the state of damage, the stage of ASR and with it an approximate assessment of its future development.
ASR present in the River dam is not caused by the aggregates, but by the poorly dispersed SF forming large agglomerates. The microstructure clearly indicates that these agglomerates have been expanding, leading to ASR-typical cracks. In the CPT the concrete showed no expansion at all. It can be assumed that the SF used to produce the concrete prism for the accelerated test was well dispersed, mitigating ASR instead of triggering it.
The expansion in the CPT in case of the viaduct was very low with a value of 0.05 ‰. This seems to be in contrast to the clear signs of ASR present in the structure. However, it has to be taken into account that no alkali boosting was used for the CPT in this particular case. With alkali boosting the expansion in the CPT might have been higher. This would have placed the expansion value more in line with the damage observed in the structure.
The few signs of ASR in bridge 1 go well together with the expansion in the CPT that is clearly below the limit value of 0.2 ‰. The used dosage of FA (100 kg/m3) was probably effective to suppress ASR in spite of the highly reactive aggregate.
The expansion potential of the concrete used for the oil-water basin is indicated as low by the CPT with a value of 0.13 ‰ after five months. On the other hand, the microstructural analysis indicates a moderate damage. In this case, the CPT somewhat underestimates the ASR potential.
The three studied structures of the subway clearly show the effect of exposure. Only the structure exposed to rain showed ASR in spite of the identical mix design in all three structures. The expansion in the CPT that is slightly below the limit value seems to go along with the ASR status of the affected structure.
The CPT of the concrete used in bridge 2 resulted in an expansion just below the limit value. Therefore, the assessed damage and damage potential assessed by the microstructural investigation fit well.
The microstructure of the concrete used in the Railway station shows that the majority of the aggregates is affected by ASR leading to a connected network of microcracks. This seems to be no surprise because the structure is exposed to the weather and the CPT clearly indicated a potentially reactive concrete with an expansion above the limit value.
The tunnel entrance showed the most developed ASR of the studied structures, with relatively few affected aggregates but the formation of ASR products already easily observable with the optical microscope. Here again, this was to be expected as the CPT indicated a potentially reactive concrete with an expansion of 0.3 ‰.
The comparison between the expansion potential in the CPT and the observed damage in the microstructural analysis are summarized in Figure 6. As the structures are relatively recent and ASR is in its early stage, the values for the crack-index are low. Still, there is a trend for an increased crack-index with increasing expansion in the CPT. The only outlier is the viaduct. As already explained above, this is likely the result of the missing alkali boosting in the CPT. With alkali boosting, the expansion of the CPT in case of the viaduct would have moved into the direction of the arrow in Figure 6. The viaduct is not taken into account in the calculation of the regression line. Additionally, the value of the river dam is not shown, because SF agglomerates were responsible for expansion and not the aggregates. A qualitative assessment in regard to the expansion potential of the structures in the future based on age and crack index is shown in Table 2.
Structure | AAR expansion potential based on CPT | Assessed ASR damage potential in the future of structure |
---|---|---|
River dam | very low | very low |
Viaduct | low | low to medium |
Bridge 1 | low | low |
Oil-water basin | low | medium |
Subway | low to medium, below limit value | medium |
Bridge 2 | low to medium, below limit value | medium |
Train station | medium to high | medium to high |
Tunnel entrance | medium to high | high |
The used dosages of SCM were only able to suppress ASR nearly completely in the case of bridge 1. In the other cases, ASR was only slowed down. The observed damages were clearly lower than in other structures produced with concrete containing the same or similar aggregates and no SCM. However, it seems to be advisable to use at least 100 kg/m3 of FA to suppress ASR with the type of aggregates used. In the case of bridge 2 even a dosage of 20 kg/m3 of SF was not sufficient to eliminate ASR. Additionally, the combination of relatively low doses of FA and SF has not been shown to be fully effective.
In regard to the microstructural analysis, thin sections are well suited to identify expanding aggregate particles based on the crack patterns, to determine a crack-index and to identify larger deposits of ASR products formed in aggregates and extrusions thereof into the cement paste. However, often the small amount of crystalline ASR products present in aggregates at an early stage of the reaction are below the resolution limit of optical microscopy. Therefore, the combination of optical microscopy with SEM/EDX is beneficial to verify the presence of ASR without ambiguity.
5. CONCLUSIONS
⌅The expansion of the CPT was compared with the condition of concrete structures in which the same mix design used in the CPT was applied. The different concrete mix design contained both reactive aggregates and SCM. Based on the results, the following conclusions can be drawn:
-
The CPT seems to be suitable to asses the expansion potential of concrete containing SCM used in structures. However, the database has to be enlarged for further verification.
-
Alkali boosting of the concrete used for the CPT seems to be necessary to better reflect the behaviour of the concrete in the structure.
-
Using different batches of SF and likely FA for the CPT and the structure may lead to a change in the expansion potential of one or the other.
-
Low amounts of SCM (FA ≤ 80 kg/m3, SF ≤ 20 kg/m3), even when used in combination, are not able to prevent ASR and seem only successful in slowing down the reaction.
-
The analysis of thin sections is a suitable tool to determine the crack-index and identify expanding aggregate particles. However, it has to be complemented by SEM with EDX to identify ASR products in an early stage of reaction.