Materiales de Construcción 72 (347)
July-September 2022, e288
ISSN-L: 0465-2746, eISSN: 1988-3226
https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2022.01322

Utilisation of phosphogypsum along with other additives in geo- engineering- A review

Revisión sobre el empleo de fosfoyeso junto con otros aditivos en geoingeniería

B. Anamika

Department of Civil Engineering, VSSUT, (Odisha, India)

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5176-9659

G. Debabrata

Department of Civil Engineering, VSSUT, (Odisha, India)

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0704-0318

ABSTRACT

Various adverse effects and hydro-mechanical failures of soil are the dominant effects of global warming. At the same time, rapid industrial development has produced several by-products on a large scale. The reuse of industrial residues in different engineering fields without compromising the technical characteristics is propitious from the engineering, environmental, ecological and economic points of view. Phosphogypsum (PG) can be used as an alternative civil engineering material as it is rich in calcium sulphate, although it contains some radioactive molecules. Researchers are continuing to investigate the utilisation of PG by mixing it with other traditional materials to convert into alternative materials when the radioactive minerals are within the permissible limits. However, the contamination effect can be reduced by treating with citric acid. This review paper presents details of the increase in strength parameters and permeability of PG when combined with other wastes materials used in different geotechnical fields.

KEY WORDS: 
Phosphogypsum; Geotechnical applications; By-products; Strength parameters.
RESUMEN

El calentamiento global genera varios efectos adversos y fallas hidromecánicas en el suelo. Al mismo tiempo, el rápido desarrollo industrial ha producido varios subproductos a gran escala. La reutilización de residuos industriales en diferentes campos de la ingeniería sin comprometer las características técnicas es propicia desde el punto de vista ingenieril, ambiental, ecológico y económico. El fosfoyeso (PG) se puede utilizar como material alternativo de ingeniería civil ya que es rico en sulfato de calcio, aunque contiene algunas moléculas radiactivas. Los investigadores continúan evaluando la utilización de PG mezclándolo con otros materiales tradicionales, para convertirlos en materiales alternativos cuando los minerales radiactivos se encuentran dentro de los límites permisibles. Sin embargo, el efecto de contaminación se puede reducir mediante el tratamiento con ácido cítrico. Este artículo de revisión presenta detalles del aumento en los parámetros de resistencia y permeabilidad del PG cuando se combina con otros materiales de desecho utilizados en diferentes campos geotécnicos.

PALABRAS CLAVE: 
Fosfoyeso; Aplicaciones geotécnicas; Subproductos; Parámetros de resistencia.

Received: 8  February  2022; Accepted: 18  May  2022; Available on line: 5 September 2022

Citation/Citar como: Anamika, B.; Debabrata, G. (2022) Utilisation of phosphogypsum along with other additives in geoengineering– A review. Mater. construcc. 72 [347], e288 https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2022.01322

CONTENT

1. INTRODUCTION

 

Soil, a material in civil engineering, is used as a load-carrying or supporting material, construction material in road bases, embankments, earth dams, clay liners etc., as a result of which there is a constant depletion of this natural resource. Contrarily, due to global warming, soil as a geotechnical material experiences different short- and long-term threats like strength reduction, drying, soil desiccation cracking, shrinkage, microbial oxidation of soil organic matter, fluctuation of the groundwater table, land and exterior erosion, and highly dynamic pore pressure changes (11. Vardon, P.J. (2015) Climatic influence on geotechnical infrastructure: a review. Environ. Geotech. 2 [3], 166-174. https://doi.org/10.1680/envgeo.13.00055.
, 22. Trenberth, K.E. (2011) Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim. Res. 47 [1-2], 123-138. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00953.
). Hence, geo-engineering researchers are working hard to overcome this adverse situation. The simultaneously rapid growth of industry produces a large volume of industrial wastes like fly ash (FA), red mud (RM), copper slag (CS), paper pulp, ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), phosphogypsum (PG), rice husk (RH) and so on, which are generally either stored as stockpile or directly deposited into oceans globally. The accumulation of these wastes demands a large land area and causes environmental hazards such as soil and groundwater (GW) contamination and air pollution. Therefore, alternative uses of these wastes for different engineering purposes can solve the aforementioned concerns as well taking another step forward towards sustainable development. The productivity of the food industry is increased by the use of fertiliser to help meet the increasing demand from global population growth. Consequently, there have been hikes in the scale of the fertiliser industry and hence the amount of PG. PG, chemically identified as hydrated calcium sulphate (CaSO4 2H2O), is a by-product waste, 90% of which is produced by the fertiliser industry worldwide from phosphate rock digested by sulphuric acid by wet process (3-53. Tayibi, H.; Gascó, C.; Navarro, N.; López-Delgado, A.; Choura, M.; Alguacil, F.J.; López, F.A. (2011) Radiochemical characterization of phosphogypsum for engineering use. J. Environ. Prot. 02, 168-174. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2011.22019.
4. Saadaoui, E.; Ghazel, N.; Ben Romdhane, C.; Massoudi, N. (2017) Phosphogypsum: potential uses and problems - a review. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 74, 558-567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2017.1330582.
5. Rashad, A.M. (2015) Potential use of phosphogypsum in alkali-activated fly ash under the effects of elevated temperatures and thermal shock cycles. J. Clean. Prod. 87, 717-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.080.
). The amount of PG generated is estimated to be 280 MT per year globally, while India produces 6 million tonnes. However, only 15% of these were utilised due to the presence of phosphorus (P2O5), fluoride (F) and other organic substances and the rest was subsequently either landfilled or deposited into the ocean (6-106. Tayibi, H.; Choura, M.; López, F.A.; Alguacil, F.J.; López-Delgado, A. (2009) Environmental impact and management of phosphogypsum. J. Environ. Manage. 90 [8], 2377-2386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.03.007.
7. Singh, M.; Garg, M. (1997) Durability of cementitious binder derived from industrial wastes. Mater. Struct. 30 [10], 607-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02486902.
8. Yang, J.; Liu, W.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, B. (2009) Preparation of load-bearing building materials from autoclaved phosphogypsum. Constr. Build. Mater. 23 [2], 687-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.02.011.
9. Singh, M. (2002) Treating waste phosphogypsum for cement and plaster manufacture. Cem. Concr. Res. 32 [7], 1033-1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00723-8.
10. Garg, M.; Singh, M.; Kumar, R. (1996) Some aspects of the durability of a phosphogypsum-lime-fly ash binder. Constr. Build. Mater. 10 [4], 273-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(95)00085-2.
). Despite the economic benefit of the wet process, it has a demerit in generating as much as 4 to 5 tonnes of PG per tonne production of phosphate fertiliser and other phosphorus compounds (66. Tayibi, H.; Choura, M.; López, F.A.; Alguacil, F.J.; López-Delgado, A. (2009) Environmental impact and management of phosphogypsum. J. Environ. Manage. 90 [8], 2377-2386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.03.007.
, 1111. USEPA (2002) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002. National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants, Subpart R.
, 1212. Rashad, A.M. (2017) Phosphogypsum as a construction material. J. Clean. Prod. 166, 732-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.049.
). PG contains heavy metals and radioactive elements, namely uranium (238U), radium (226Ra), and thorium. Of these, 226Ra produces radon gas which has a short half-life of 3.8 days and its intense radiation capacity causes significant damage to internal organs, so it is classified as TENORM (Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material) (1111. USEPA (2002) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002. National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants, Subpart R.
, 1313. Parreira, A.B.; Kobayashi, A.R.K.; Silvestre, O.B. (2003) Influence of portland cement type on unconfined compressive strength and linear expansion of cement-stabilized phosphogypsum. J. Environ. Eng. 129, 956-960. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:10(956).
). The effluent of phosphorus, fluoride, cadmium, total suspended solids, other toxic elements and radionuclides from PG affect human health, for example causing liver dysfunction and lung disease, and also affect both soil and groundwater (1414. Mishra, C.S.K.; Nayak, S.; Guru, B.C.; Rath, M. (2010) Environmental impact and management of wastes from phosphate fertilizer plants. J. Ind. Pollut. Control. 26 [1], 57-60.
, 1515. Tirado, R.; Allsopp, M. (2012) Phosphorus in agriculture: problems and solutions. Greenpeace Research Laboratories Technical Report (Review).
). The presence of phosphoric acid, sulphuric acid and hydrofluoric acid within the porous structure in residual form prevents its application without proper guidelines on a large scale (1616. Gaidajis, G.; Anagnostopoulos, A.; Garidi, A.; Mylona, E.; Zevgolis, I.E. (2018) Laboratory evaluation of phosphogypsum for alternative uses. Environ. Geotech. 5 [6], 310-323. https://doi.org/10.1680/jenge.16.00040.
, 1717. SENES Consultants Limited (1987) An analysis of the major environmental and health concerns of phosphogypsum tailings in Canada and methods for their reduction. Alberta Environment, Canada.
). The first utilisation of PG was started in the USA in road construction and since that time it has been used as a binder, filler and other construction material. It has a good filling or binding property as its basic component is CaSO4 (1818. Wędrychowicz, M.; Bydałek, A.W.; Skrzekut, T.; Noga, P.; Gabryelewicz, I.; Madej, P. (2019) Analysis of the mechanical strength, structure and possibilities of using waste phosphogypsum in aluminum powder composites. SN Appl. Sci. 1 [9], 992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0995-1.
), which helps to form ettringite. The general chemical reaction for the production of PG obtained at a temperature of 70‒80 ºC as proved by (1919. Zairi, M.; Rouis, M.J. (1999) Environmental impacts of the storage of phosphogypsum in Sfax (Tunisia). Tunisia.
, 2020. Mesić, M.; Brezinščak, L.; Zgorelec, Ž.; et al. (2016) The application of phosphogypsum in agriculture. Agric. Conspec. Sci. 81 [1], 7-13.
) is shown in Equation [1]:

C a 3 P O 4 2 3 C a F 2 + 10 H 2 S O 4 + 20 H 2 O 6 H 3 P O 4 + 10 C a S O 4 2 H 2 O + 2 H F  [1]

The strength modification, utilization of optimum percentage of PG for different purposes along with proper justification is summarised in this review paper. The summarised results are presented in tabular and graphical form so as to help the new researchers and user to use Phoshogypsum along with other additives as alternative construction materials. This paper also emphasises the use of optimum percentage of PG for different geotechnical fields to start with so as to save time for the experimental work.

2. CHARACTERISTICS OF PHOSPHOGYPSUM

 

The application of PG can be made easier in a large part of the civil engineering field by analysing its characteristics. Therefore its physical, chemical and other characteristics are compiled for further use. The properties of PG are not only limited to the phosphorus ore but also determined by the method adopted for the extraction of phosphoric acid, the industrial operation efficiency, disposal method, age, location, the height of the landfill storage and the number of water molecules in PG crystals, namely calcium sulphate generated either in anhydrite (CaSO4), di-hydrate (CaSO4·2H2O) or hemi-hydrate (CaSO4·1/2H2O) (1313. Parreira, A.B.; Kobayashi, A.R.K.; Silvestre, O.B. (2003) Influence of portland cement type on unconfined compressive strength and linear expansion of cement-stabilized phosphogypsum. J. Environ. Eng. 129, 956-960. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:10(956).
, 21‒2321. Bhawan, P.; Nagar, A. (2014) Guidelines for management and handling of phosphogypsum generated from phosphoric acid plants (Final Draft). Central Pollution Control Board (Ministry of Environment & Forests).
22. Mashifana, T.; Okonta, F.N.; Ntuli, F. (2018) Geotechnical properties and application of lime modified phosphogypsum waste. Mater. Sci. 24 [3], 312-318 https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ms.24.3.18232.
23. Arman, A.; Seals, R.K. (1990) A preliminary assessment of utilization alternatives for phosphogypsum. In: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Phosphogypsum. FL, FIPR Pu. No. 01-060, p. 083, Orlando.
). PG feels like a slightly moist powdery material, having silt size particles with very low or no plasticity as an amalgam of gypsum (>90%) and fluorosilicate (2424. Degirmenci, N.; Okucu, A.; Turabi, A. (2007) Application of phosphogypsum in soil stabilization. Build. Environ. 42 [9], 3393-3398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.08.010.
, 2525. Kacimi, L.; Simon-Masseron, A.; Ghomari, A.; Derriche, Z. (2006) Reduction of clinkerization temperature by using phosphogypsum. J. Hazard. Mater. 137 [1], 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.12.053.
). The existence of orthophosphoric acid, in which the heavy metals and fluorine are in a soluble state, promotes leaching (2626. Folek, S.; Walawska, B.; Wilczek, B.; Miśkiewicz, J. (2011). Use of phosphogypsum in road construction. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 13 [2], 18-22.
). Leaching of these hazardous elements from a PG stack is one of the prime concerns for groundwater contamination (27‒2927. May, A.; Sweeney, J.W. (1982) Assessment of environmental impacts associated with phosphogypsum in Florid. Florida.
28. Carter, O.C.; Scheiner, B. J. (1992) Investigation of metal and non-metal migration through phosphogypsum. In: AIME proceedings on the symposium on emerging process technologies for a cleaner environment. pp 205-210.
29. Berish, C.W. (1990) Potential environmental hazards of phosphogypsum storage in central Florida. In: Proceedings of the third international symposium on phosphogypsum. FL, FIPR Pub. No. 01060083, Orlando.
). Ultimately these dissolved elements are transferred to living bodies via the groundwater (3030. Reijnders, L. (2007) Cleaner phosphogypsum, coal combustion ashes and waste incineration ashes for application in building materials: A review. Build. Environ. 42 [2], 1036-1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.09.016.
). The orthophosphoric acid and calcium sulphate (CaSO4) cause the pH value to lie between 2 and 3, which indicates the acidic behaviour of PG (2424. Degirmenci, N.; Okucu, A.; Turabi, A. (2007) Application of phosphogypsum in soil stabilization. Build. Environ. 42 [9], 3393-3398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.08.010.
, 2626. Folek, S.; Walawska, B.; Wilczek, B.; Miśkiewicz, J. (2011). Use of phosphogypsum in road construction. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 13 [2], 18-22.
). The lower pH value of PG makes it resistive in reaction with soil grains and Ca ions, whereas the addition of cement decreases the acidity, hence encapsulating the impurities present in the PG (2424. Degirmenci, N.; Okucu, A.; Turabi, A. (2007) Application of phosphogypsum in soil stabilization. Build. Environ. 42 [9], 3393-3398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.08.010.
). The pH value determines the solubility of the material and means that it is highly soluble in salt water (3131. Guo, T.; Malone, R.F.; Rusch, K.A. (2001) Stabilized phosphogypsum: class C fly ash: Portland type II cement composites for potential marine application. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 [19], 3967-3973. https://doi.org/10.1021/es010520+.
). Distinguishing between gypsum and phosphogypsum is done by microscopic analysis, as both have the same chemical formula. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) reveals that PG has a more crystalline and distinct structure than gypsum, the crystals of which are hexagonal and rhombic in shape (3232. Rajkovic, M.B.; Toskovic, D.V. (2003) Phosphogypsum surface characterisation using scanning electron microscopy. Acta Period. Technol. 34, 61-70. https://doi.org/10.2298/APT0334061R.
). The performance of radioactive elements such as 226Ra, 210Pb, 210Po, 238U and 234U depends upon the parent phosphate rocks (3333. Lysandrou, M.; Pashalidis, I. (2008) Uranium chemistry in stack solutions and leachates of phosphogypsum disposed at a coastal area in Cyprus. J. Environ. Radioact. 99 [2], 359-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.08.005.
, 3434. Pérez-López, R.; Álvarez-Valero, A.M.; Nieto, J.M. (2007) Changes in mobility of toxic elements during the production of phosphoric acid in the fertilizer industry of Huelva (SW Spain) and environmental impact of phosphogypsum wastes. J. Hazard. Mater. 148 [3], 745-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.068.
). Different researchers have referred to different radioactive nuclides as most hazardous; for example, Rutherford (1994) reported 226Ra, whereas Pérez-López (2007) indicated the 234U of parent rock is associated with non-mobile fraction whereas PG contains high Uranium concentration bounded to the bio-available fraction (3434. Pérez-López, R.; Álvarez-Valero, A.M.; Nieto, J.M. (2007) Changes in mobility of toxic elements during the production of phosphoric acid in the fertilizer industry of Huelva (SW Spain) and environmental impact of phosphogypsum wastes. J. Hazard. Mater. 148 [3], 745-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.068.
, 3535. Rutherford, P.M.; Dudas, M.J.; Samek, R.A. (1994) Environmental impacts of phosphogypsum. Sci. Total Environ. 149 [1-2], 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(94)90002-7.
). The application of PG was banned in the USA in 1990 and the EU discontinued its use in 1992 (3636. Federal Register 13480. (1990).
). Due to all these problems, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) restricted the use of PG to up to 370 Bq per kg concentration of 226Ra in agricultural soil and the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) set the limit of 500 Bq/kg (37-4037. EPA (1998) Code of Federal Regulations, 1998. Title 40 7: Parts 61.202 and 61.204 (40CFR61.202 and 40CFR61.204.
38. EURATOM Council Directive 96/26 EC. (1996).
39. Federal Register (1999) 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart 61, 64: pp. 5573-5580.
40. Kumar, S. (2002) A perspective study on fly ash-lime-gypsum bricks and hollow blocks for low cost housing development. Constr. Build. Mater. 16, 519-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(02)00034-X.
). Despite these contaminates, it cannot be classified as toxic waste because it is not corrosive and the average total elemental concentrations of elements categorised as toxic (Ba, As, Cr, Cd, Hg, Pb, Se and Ag) by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are lower than the allowable toxic elemental criteria for toxic hazardous waste (3535. Rutherford, P.M.; Dudas, M.J.; Samek, R.A. (1994) Environmental impacts of phosphogypsum. Sci. Total Environ. 149 [1-2], 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(94)90002-7.
). The main constituents of PG and the impurities need to be known for application and in view of environmental concerns. Therefore, the chemical compositions obtained through X-ray fluorescence (XRF) testing are summarised in Table 1, based on different sources. The experimental results proved that the electrical conductivity of PG is greater than soil, with values from 20 to 5 dSm−1 (very saline) and <5 dSm−1 (slightly saline) respectively, which confirms rich nutrients (4141. Vásconez-Maza, M.D.; Martínez-Segura, M.A.; Bueso, M.C.; Faz, Á.; García-Nieto, M.C.; Gabarrón, M.; Acosta, J.A. (2019) Predicting spatial distribution of heavy metals in an abandoned phosphogypsum pond combining geochemistry, electrical resistivity tomography and statistical methods. J. Hazard. Mater. 374, 392-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.045.
). The surface area obtained from Moroccan PG is 0.64 m2/g (4242. Amrani, M.; Taha, Y.; Kchikach, A.; Benzaazoua, M.; Hakkou, R. (2020) Phosphogypsum recycling: New horizons for a more sustainable road material application. J. Build. Eng. 30, 101267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101267.
). The mineralogical and morphological characteristics can be obtained by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) spectrophotometry tests. The crystalline morphology characteristics found in SEM analysis of unprocessed PG appear as platelets oriented in a parallelepiped shape, with lengths ranging from a few to 400 micrometres (μm) and a thickness of fewer than 10 μm. The higher value of the aspect ratio becomes a favourable criterion for quick crushing under different stresses (4242. Amrani, M.; Taha, Y.; Kchikach, A.; Benzaazoua, M.; Hakkou, R. (2020) Phosphogypsum recycling: New horizons for a more sustainable road material application. J. Build. Eng. 30, 101267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101267.
).

Table 1.  Chemical composition of PG.
Country Industry Reference Chemical composition
CaO SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 MgO SO3 Na2O K2O CaCO3 P2O5
Tunisia Unknown sources (4343. Farroukh, H.; Mnif, T.; Kamoun, F.; Kamoun, L.; Bennour, F. (2018) Stabilization of clayey soils with Tunisian phosphogypsum: effect on geotechnical properties. Arab. J. Geosci. 11 [23], 760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-4116-z.
)
34.6 2.45 0.17 0.23 0.14 - 0.32 0.05 44.1 0.71
India Coromandel International Limited (4444. James, J.; Kasinatha Pandian, P. (2016) Plasticity, swell-shrink, and microstructure of phosphogypsum admixed lime stabilized expansive soil. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2016, 9798456. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9798456.
)
35.728 16.957 0.649 35.728 0.661 - 0.106 0.042 - 10.701
Morocco Phosphoric acid production plant (4242. Amrani, M.; Taha, Y.; Kchikach, A.; Benzaazoua, M.; Hakkou, R. (2020) Phosphogypsum recycling: New horizons for a more sustainable road material application. J. Build. Eng. 30, 101267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101267.
)
31.16 1.03 0.85 0.012 - 44.01 0.21 0.001 - 0.96
Poland GZNF “Fosfory” 26 25.5 - - - - 53.3 - - -
South Africa Phosphoric acid manufacturing plant (4545. Mashifana, T.P.; Okonta, F.N.; Ntuli, F. (2018) Geotechnical properties and microstructure of lime-fly ash-phosphogypsum-stabilized soil. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2018, 3640868. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3640868.
)
44 1.37 0.23 0.121 51 - - - 1.28
China Mianzu of Sichuan (4646. Xiao, W.; Yao, X.; Zhang, F. (2019) Recycling of oily sludge as a roadbed material utilizing phosphogypsum-based cementitious materials. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019, 6280715. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6280715.
)
30.85 4.65 4.20 0.24 31.85 0.34 - - 3.22
Latvia Fertiliser production plant (AB Lifosa, Lithuania (4747. Bumanis, G.; Zorica, J.; Bajare, D.; Korjakins, A. (2018) Technological properties of phosphogypsum binder obtained from fertilizer production waste. Energy Proc. 147, 301-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.096.
)
37.6 4.8 0.26 0.1 0.8 54 - - - 1.7
Unknown sources Unknown sources (4848. Tsioka, M.; Voudrias, E.A. (2020) Comparison of alternative management methods for phosphogypsum waste using life cycle analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 266, 121386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121386.
)
38.14 0.86 0.19 0.21 - 48.12 0.17 0.01 - 0.69
Poland Recycling Plant Eko Harpoon sp. z o.o. (1818. Wędrychowicz, M.; Bydałek, A.W.; Skrzekut, T.; Noga, P.; Gabryelewicz, I.; Madej, P. (2019) Analysis of the mechanical strength, structure and possibilities of using waste phosphogypsum in aluminum powder composites. SN Appl. Sci. 1 [9], 992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0995-1.
)
69.5 as CaSO4 1.7 2.51 - - 0.89 0.5 - 2.9

In the presence of a hydraulic binder, the chemical composition aids in understanding the response between PG and other constituents. It can be predicted from the table that the abundant calcium ion in PG can form a gel of calcium aluminate hydrate or calcium-silicate when mixed with other material that is rich in silica and alumina, to reduce the water sensitivity and subsequently increase the mechanical properties. The chemical composition of PG includes radioactive elements, traces of heavy metals such as As, Cr, Cd, Hg, Pb, fluoride, zinc, antimony, and copper (4949. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1990.
), along with some other chemical elements that can be used for the production of bricks, blocks, tiles, and artificial stone.

3. TREATMENT OF PG

 

Landfilling of PG waste releases dust as well as leachate of hazardous elements, fluoride and heavy metals, which causes air, soil and groundwater pollution (5050. Landa, E. R. (2007) Naturally occurring radionuclides from industrial sources: characteristics and fate in the environment. In: Radioactivity in the Environment. 211-237.
, 5151. Iqbal, H.; Anwar, B.M.; Hanif, U.; et al. (2015) Leaching of metals, organic carbon and nutrients from municipal waste under semi-arid conditions. Int. J. Environ. Res. 9 [1], 187-196.
). The presence of natural radioactive nuclides and impurities, namely phosphate and fluoride, reduces the strength and extends the setting time, causing a high level of pentafluoroaluminate (ALF-5) to disturb the gypsum development, thus limiting its use as a construction material to as low as 15% globally (5252. Rusch, K.A.; Guo, T.; Seals, R.K. (2002) Stabilization of phosphogypsum using class C fly ash and lime: assessment of the potential for marine applications. J. Hazard. Mater. 93 [2], 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00009-2.
, 5353. Koopman, C. (2001) Purification of gypsum from the phosphoric acid production by recrystallization with simultaneous extraction. PhD. dissertation. DSM Research Geleen Centre for Particle Technology.
, 1212. Rashad, A.M. (2017) Phosphogypsum as a construction material. J. Clean. Prod. 166, 732-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.049.
). Researchers all over the world have been treating the waste to make it safe for disposal and increase the potential for its massive application without environmental concerns. Manjit et al. (1993) washed PG using aqueous hydroxide solution (5‒20%) then dried it at 42 ºC to minimise the amount of P2O5, F, and all the contaminants were abridged (5454. Singh, M.; Garg, M.; Rehsi, S.S. (1993) Purifying phosphogypsum for cement manufacture. Constr. Build. Mater. 7 [1], 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(93)90018-8.
). Aly and Mohammed (1999) recovered fluorine and lanthanides by using nitric acid (HNO3) (5555. Aly, M.M.; Mohammed, N.A. (1999) Recovery of lanthanides from Abu Tartur phosphate rock, Egypt. Hydrometallurgy. 52 [2], 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(99)00018-3.
). A wet sieving and hydro-cyclone method followed by heat drying was adopted by Manjit (1996), who identified the reduction of impurities and increment of pH and SO3 values (5656. Singh, M.; Garg, M.; Verma, C.L.; Handa, S.K.; Kumar, R. (1996) An improved process for the purification of phosphogypsum. Constr. Build. Mater. 10 [8], 597-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(96)00019-0.
). The extraction of radionuclides of more than 60% and rare earth elements by organic extractors in kerosene diluent with a liquid to solid ratio of 1:1 at 55 ºC was examined by El-Didamony et al. (5757. El-Didamony, H.; Ali, M.M.; Awwad, N.; Fawzy, M.M.; Attallah, M. (2012) Treatment of phosphogypsum waste using suitable organic extractants. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 291, 907-914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1547-3.
). The exchange or membrane technique was adopted, combined with recrystallisation by Koopman and Witkamp, who showed that more than 90% of the heavy metals and lanthanides were removed (5858. Koopman, C.; Witkamp, G.J. (2002) Ion exchange extraction during continuous recrystallization of CaSO4 in the phosphoric acid production process: lanthanide extraction efficiency and CaSO4 particle shape. Hydrometallurgy. 63 [2], 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(01)00219-5.
). Mashifana et al. (2018) used 0.5M citric acid with a 40% solid load concentration based on the studies of (59‒6259. Santos, E.A.; Ladeira, A.C.Q. (2011) Recovery of uranium from mine waste by leaching with carbonate-based reagents. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 [8], 3591-3597. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2002056.
60. Fernandes, H.M.; Veiga, L.H.S.; Franklin, M.R.; Prado, V.C S.; Taddei, J.F. (1995). Environmental impact assessment of uranium mining and milling facilities: a study case at the Poços de Caldas uranium mining and milling site, Brazil. J. Geochem. Explor. 52 [1-2], 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6742(94)00043-B.
61. Merritt, C.R. (1971) Extractive metallurgy of uraniu. Colorado School of Mines Research Institute.
62. (1997) Congress Catalog Card (No. 71-157076).
) and observed remarkable results in removing radionuclides, P2O5 and F by up to 92.8%, 34.7% and 18.87% respectively (2222. Mashifana, T.; Okonta, F.N.; Ntuli, F. (2018) Geotechnical properties and application of lime modified phosphogypsum waste. Mater. Sci. 24 [3], 312-318 https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ms.24.3.18232.
, 6363 Mashifana, T. (2019) Evaluation of raw and chemically treated waste phosphogypsum and its potential applications. In: Iticescu C, Guo Z (eds) E3S Web of Conferences. p 02004.
). Al-Jabbari et al. washed PG with water and passed it through a 100 mm sieve, then calcined it by hydrated lime at various temperatures, and reported this as the lowest cost method of treatment. The modified PG was free of pollutants, with both setting and strength properties improved (6464. Al-Jabbari, S.; Faisal, F.; Ali, S.; Nasir, S. (1988) The physical methods for purification of the phosphogypsum for using it as building material. J. Build. Res. Sci. Res. Council Baghdad. 7, 49-69.
).

4. APPLICATION OF PHOSPHOGYPSUM IN CONSTRUCTION

 

Chemical tests have confirmed that PG is highly acidic and contains radionuclide elements. However, the Atomic Energy Regulation Board of India in 2009 decreed in its directive (number 01/09) that the sale of PG for construction purposes does not require its approval, provided the activity concentration of 226Ra is less than 1.0 Bq/g (6565. Guidelines for management and handling of phosphogypsum generated from phosphoric acid plants (Draft copy) (2012) Central Pollution Control Board New Delhi India. (2012).
). Campos et al. examined the radon exhalation of PG-manufactured bricks and plates and found it to be the same as ordinary construction materials, and therefore suggested a safe practice without any prior handling (6666. Campos, M.P.; Costa, L.J.P.; Nisti, M.B.; Mazzilli, B.P. (2017) Phosphogypsum recycling in the building materials industry: assessment of the radon exhalation rate. J. Environ. Radioact. 172, 232-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.04.002.
).

4.1. For geotechnical purposes

 

Due to the lack of Si and Al content, the formation of aluminosilicate and/ or calcium silicate hydrate gel, which are prime factors for strength and durability, is not possible, which is why PG cannot be used alone as a binding or stabilising agent. In this section, the latent deviations in terms of physicochemical and mechanical characteristics of soil will be discussed when modified with PG together with other additives. James and Pandian (2016) modified black cotton soil into an enduring engineering soil with the help of PG and lime. The experimental results showed that soil with lime (7%) and PG (2%) effectively reduced the swelling‒shrinkage and plasticity behaviour, as shown in Figure 1a and 1b respectively (4444. James, J.; Kasinatha Pandian, P. (2016) Plasticity, swell-shrink, and microstructure of phosphogypsum admixed lime stabilized expansive soil. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2016, 9798456. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9798456.
). Sivapullaiah and Jha (2014) predicted the reduction in the liquid limit after the addition of lime to fly ash stabilised soil, which may be due to the replacement of sodium ions with calcium ions, reduction in the diffused double layer, and increase in the electrolyte concentration of the pore fluid. The addition of PG, which can act as a source of calcium ions, may have similar effects on the soil. The resulting elevated unconfined compressive strength (UCS) value may be due to the acceleration of the pozzolanic reaction (6767. Sivapullaiah, P.V.; Jha, A.K. (2014) Gypsum induced strength behaviour of fly ash-lime stabilized expansive soil. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 32 [5], 1261-1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9799-7.
). The same pozzolanic reaction was observed by Kumar and Dutta (2017) by treating bentonite soil with 8% lime and 8% PG and 1% sisal fibres, which raised the UCS by 631.46% as compared to raw bentonite soil at 28 days of curing.

medium/medium-MC-72-347-e288-gf1.png
Figure 1.  a) Free swelling of lime-stabilised soil admixed with PG (reproduced from (4444. James, J.; Kasinatha Pandian, P. (2016) Plasticity, swell-shrink, and microstructure of phosphogypsum admixed lime stabilized expansive soil. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2016, 9798456. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9798456.
)); b) Effect of PG on the plasticity of 7% lime-stabilised soil (reproduced from (4444. James, J.; Kasinatha Pandian, P. (2016) Plasticity, swell-shrink, and microstructure of phosphogypsum admixed lime stabilized expansive soil. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2016, 9798456. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9798456.
)).

The formation of cementing gel and the adhesion of bentonite particles with sisal fibres were affected if the quantity of stabilisers applied was beyond the above-mentioned limit, and the development of lumps lessened the UCS. The trend of the results was verified through the unconfined undrained (UU) triaxial test, which found an identical trend of strength variation. The excess sulphate in PG may be the reason for resistance to the creation of pozzolanic compounds and the subsequent diminution of cohesion. The SEM (EDAS) test revealed that PG content above 8% was caused by a low Si/Al ratio, which resulted in strength reduction (6868. Kumar, S.; Tilak, V.; Dutta, R.K. (2017) Engineering properties of bentonite-lime-phosphogypsum composite reinforced with treated sisal fibers. Period. Polytech-Civ. 61 [3], 554-563. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.8183.
). Shilva et al. (2019) treated laterite soil with hemihydrate phosphogypsum (PGH) and a small quantity of cement; furthermore, they observed the durability and mechanical characteristics to emphasise the suitability for asphalt pavement layers. They observed that although 7 days of immersion in water reduced the UCS value by 54% in a PG rich sample, the same sample showed an increment in UCS by 603% after 12 wet‒dry cycles (6969. Silva, M.V.; de Rezende, L.R.; Mascarenha, M.M.A.; de Oliveira, R.B. (2019) Phosphogypsum, tropical soil and cement mixtures for asphalt pavements under wet and dry environmental conditions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 144, 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.029.
). Though Ho et al. (2017) concluded that the lower the water content, the higher the strength obtained, they found that hydration, carbonation and the late pozzolanic reaction which took place during the wet cycles lead to a decrease in the water content and subsequently increase the resilient modulus. However, the formation of ettringite due to the presence of cement leads to the development of microcracks and pores, which accelerates the uncontrolled leaching (7070. Ho, L.S.; Nakarai, K.; Ogawa, Y.; Sasaki, T.; Morioka, M. (2017) Strength development of cement-treated soils: Effects of water content, carbonation, and pozzolanic reaction under drying curing condition. Constr. Build. Mater. 134, 703-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.065.
). Babu et al. (2019) studied the effectiveness of PG and crumb waste rubber (CRW) to stabilise BC soil for use as subgrade material. The improvement of the compressive strength of the soil by using PG is shown in Figure 2.

medium/medium-MC-72-347-e288-gf2.png
Figure 2.  Variation of UCS of soil along with change in percentage of PG (reproduced from (7171. Babu, R.D.; Raviteja, K.V.N.S.; Varaprasad, L.N.V.N. (2019) Strength characterization of expansive soil treated with phosphogypsum and crumb waste rubber. In: Geo-Congress 2019. ASCE, Reston, VA, pp 315-324.
)).

It was stated that the strength improvement occurred because of the pozzolanic reaction, binder development and discrete reinforcing effect, with an optimum quantity of 6% PG and 2% CRW (7171. Babu, R.D.; Raviteja, K.V.N.S.; Varaprasad, L.N.V.N. (2019) Strength characterization of expansive soil treated with phosphogypsum and crumb waste rubber. In: Geo-Congress 2019. ASCE, Reston, VA, pp 315-324.
). Based on the above conclusions and experimental results, research has been carried out on using PG in civil engineering materials. Sihag (2019) used PG to stabilise black cotton soil with the addition of lime and FA and found it to be suitable for the non-bituminous layers of a flexible pavement based on the geotechnical characteristics and involvement of PG. The results showed that the soaked California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value increased by 432.25% and the UCS value reached up to 5.1 MPa for the treated soil, whereas it was only 1.5 MPa for untreated soil. The use of only 1% PG along with other agents increased the strength characteristics and made it suitable for the purpose (7272. Peaveen, S. (2019) A study on high expensive black cotton soil to find out the properties with the help of mixing other soil stabilising material. Int. J. Bus. Eng. Res. 1-11.
). Folek et al. (2011) used stockpiled PG and FA with a binder for constructing a parking lot and checked the serviceability after one and a half years, confirming that both the geotechnical and physio-chemical parameters were satisfactory, following laboratory testing at the time of construction. They suggested that these composites can be used for sub-base without a binder below the frost penetration zone for light traffic (2626. Folek, S.; Walawska, B.; Wilczek, B.; Miśkiewicz, J. (2011). Use of phosphogypsum in road construction. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 13 [2], 18-22.
). An appreciable number of studies have been conducted using PG along with other wastes or conventional materials for stabilising BC or weak soils to make them suitable to apply in different geotechnical fields, mainly sub-grade, sub-base and construction material (1212. Rashad, A.M. (2017) Phosphogypsum as a construction material. J. Clean. Prod. 166, 732-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.049.
1313. Parreira, A.B.; Kobayashi, A.R.K.; Silvestre, O.B. (2003) Influence of portland cement type on unconfined compressive strength and linear expansion of cement-stabilized phosphogypsum. J. Environ. Eng. 129, 956-960. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:10(956).
, 4242. Amrani, M.; Taha, Y.; Kchikach, A.; Benzaazoua, M.; Hakkou, R. (2020) Phosphogypsum recycling: New horizons for a more sustainable road material application. J. Build. Eng. 30, 101267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101267.
, 4343. Farroukh, H.; Mnif, T.; Kamoun, F.; Kamoun, L.; Bennour, F. (2018) Stabilization of clayey soils with Tunisian phosphogypsum: effect on geotechnical properties. Arab. J. Geosci. 11 [23], 760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-4116-z.
, 4545. Mashifana, T.P.; Okonta, F.N.; Ntuli, F. (2018) Geotechnical properties and microstructure of lime-fly ash-phosphogypsum-stabilized soil. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2018, 3640868. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3640868.
, 4646. Xiao, W.; Yao, X.; Zhang, F. (2019) Recycling of oily sludge as a roadbed material utilizing phosphogypsum-based cementitious materials. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019, 6280715. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6280715.
, 6363 Mashifana, T. (2019) Evaluation of raw and chemically treated waste phosphogypsum and its potential applications. In: Iticescu C, Guo Z (eds) E3S Web of Conferences. p 02004.
, 73‒7973. Mashifana, T.P.; Okonta, F. N.; Ntuli, F. (2019) Development of low content phosphogypsum waste composites modified by lime-fly ash-basic oxygen furnace slag. Rev. Rom. Mater. 49 [2], 294-302.
74. Maazoun, H.; Bouassida, M. (2019) Phosphogypsum management challenges in Tunisia. 88-104.
75. Sudhakar, P.; Ramesh Babu, V.; Ramesh Babu, B. (2016) A study on subgrade characteristics of black cotton soil treated with lime and phosphogypsum. IRJET. 3, 12.
76. Divya Krishnan, K.; Deepika, M.; Ravichandran, P.T.; Sudha, C.; Kottuppillil, A.K. (2016) Study on behaviour of soil with phosphogypsum as stabiliser. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9 [23], 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i23/95980.
77. Kumar Dutta, R.; Khatri, V.N.; Panwar, V. (2017) Strength characteristics of fly ash stabilized with lime and modified with phosphogypsum. J. Build. Eng. 14, 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.09.010.
78. Farroukh, H.; Mnif, T.; Kamoun, F.; Kamoun, L.; Bennour, F. (2017) Investigation of the strength development in tunisian phosphogypsum-stabilized sensitive clayey soils: Assess of geotechnical properties and environmental impact. ASRJETS. 29 [1], 153-166.
79. Devipriya, P.V.; Chandrakaran, S. (2017) Effect of phosphogypsum as a stabilizing agent for swelling clays. J. Recent Advanc. Geotech. Engineer.
). The compressive strength of soil with the addition of varying percentages of PG with different curing periods is shown in Figure 3.

medium/medium-MC-72-347-e288-gf3.png
Figure 3.  Variation of UCS of soil with variation of PG content at different curing periods (reproduced from (7979. Devipriya, P.V.; Chandrakaran, S. (2017) Effect of phosphogypsum as a stabilizing agent for swelling clays. J. Recent Advanc. Geotech. Engineer.
)).

The test results of various studies are summarised in Tables 2 and 3 based on the mechanical characteristics. Different studies used different types of additives, which exhibited changes in the results. Therefore, it is easy to understand the effects of the additives by identifying the changes in the properties of soil with different modifiers along with PG.

Table 2.  Comparative index properties of soil.
Composition Reference Liquid limit Plastic limit Plasticity index
Black cotton soil (BC) (7575. Sudhakar, P.; Ramesh Babu, V.; Ramesh Babu, B. (2016) A study on subgrade characteristics of black cotton soil treated with lime and phosphogypsum. IRJET. 3, 12.
)
54 19 35
BC + 4% lime + 8% PG 35 25 10
Clay and PG (7979. Devipriya, P.V.; Chandrakaran, S. (2017) Effect of phosphogypsum as a stabilizing agent for swelling clays. J. Recent Advanc. Geotech. Engineer.
)
49.4 22.9 26.5
41.3 20 21.3
Black cotton soil (4545. Mashifana, T.P.; Okonta, F.N.; Ntuli, F. (2018) Geotechnical properties and microstructure of lime-fly ash-phosphogypsum-stabilized soil. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2018, 3640868. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3640868.
)
94.9 74.5 20.4
BC + Treated PG 65.26 50.05 15.21
Expansive soil (ES) (4444. James, J.; Kasinatha Pandian, P. (2016) Plasticity, swell-shrink, and microstructure of phosphogypsum admixed lime stabilized expansive soil. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2016, 9798456. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9798456.
)
68 27 41
ES + 7% lime + 1% PG 46.75 43.22 3.55
Table 3.  Maximum strength parameters of untreated and treated soil.
Composition (reference) Test conducted Results
Untreated Treated
BC soil + lime 4% + PG 4% (7575. Sudhakar, P.; Ramesh Babu, V.; Ramesh Babu, B. (2016) A study on subgrade characteristics of black cotton soil treated with lime and phosphogypsum. IRJET. 3, 12.
)
Shear 0.98 kg/cm2 0.164 kg/cm2
Soil + PG 6% (7676. Divya Krishnan, K.; Deepika, M.; Ravichandran, P.T.; Sudha, C.; Kottuppillil, A.K. (2016) Study on behaviour of soil with phosphogypsum as stabiliser. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9 [23], 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i23/95980.
)
UCS (28 days curing) 122 kPa 336 kPa
Soil + PG 6% + CRW 2.5% (7171. Babu, R.D.; Raviteja, K.V.N.S.; Varaprasad, L.N.V.N. (2019) Strength characterization of expansive soil treated with phosphogypsum and crumb waste rubber. In: Geo-Congress 2019. ASCE, Reston, VA, pp 315-324.
)
Soaked & unsoaked California Bearing Ratio 1.7 & 3.3 8.5 & 10.3
UCS (28 days curing) 80 kPa 180 kPa
100% PG (1616. Gaidajis, G.; Anagnostopoulos, A.; Garidi, A.; Mylona, E.; Zevgolis, I.E. (2018) Laboratory evaluation of phosphogypsum for alternative uses. Environ. Geotech. 5 [6], 310-323. https://doi.org/10.1680/jenge.16.00040.
)
TRIAXIAL - UU TEST saturated PG & partially saturated PG - 765 kPa
185 kPa & 42º
CBR - 260
UCS (0 days curing) - 4.97 MPa
PG: soil material (SM) = 40:60 (4242. Amrani, M.; Taha, Y.; Kchikach, A.; Benzaazoua, M.; Hakkou, R. (2020) Phosphogypsum recycling: New horizons for a more sustainable road material application. J. Build. Eng. 30, 101267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101267.
)
Compression index 0.25 0.158
Soaked CBR 9 19
Modified Proctor compaction γd & OMC 14.8 kN/m3 & 17% respectively 16.5 kN/m3 & 15% respectively
Shear parameters C and ϕ 2 kPa and 35º respectively 7 kPa 31º respectively
Mashfana (4545. Mashifana, T.P.; Okonta, F.N.; Ntuli, F. (2018) Geotechnical properties and microstructure of lime-fly ash-phosphogypsum-stabilized soil. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2018, 3640868. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3640868.
) soil with 30% raw PG stabiliser
RPG (PG 50% FA 30% 20% lime)
UCS (7 days curing) 0.15 MPa 0.82 MPa
Mashfana (4545. Mashifana, T.P.; Okonta, F.N.; Ntuli, F. (2018) Geotechnical properties and microstructure of lime-fly ash-phosphogypsum-stabilized soil. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2018, 3640868. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3640868.
) Soil with 50% TPG (50% PG 10% FA 10% lime 30% BOF slag)
1.65 MPa
Bian et al. (8181. Bian, X.; Zeng, L.; Ji, F.; Xie, M.; Hong, Z. (2022) Plasticity role in strength behavior of cement-phosphogypsum stabilized soils. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. (in press) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.01.003.
) cement 100 kg/m3 PG 20 kg/m3 SOIL.
UCS (28 days curing) 65 kPa 470 kPa
Satyaveni et al. (8282. Satyaveni, B.; Sridevi, K.; Sivanarayana, C.; Prasad, D.S. (2018) A study on strength characteristics of baggasse ash and phospho gypsum treated marine clay. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 5 [7], 11-16.
) Marine Soil: 20% baggage ash: 6% PG
OMC & MDD 29.5 & 1.36 g/cc respectively 27.9 & 1.46 g/cc respectively
UCS 72 kPa 119 kPa
Soaked CBR 1.4 6.5
Harrou et al. (8383. Harrou, A.; Gharibi, E.; Nasri, H.; Fagel, N.; El Ouahabi, M. (2020) Physico-mechanical properties of phosphogypsum and black steel slag as aggregate for bentonite-lime based materials. Mater. Today Proc. 31, S51-S55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.819.
) bentonite clay: 8% lime: 8% PG: 8% steel slag
UCS (28 days curing) 0.23 MPa 1.057 MPa
Yu et al. (8484. Yu, Z.H.; Gui, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Kong, X.Y. (2013) Experimental study on the stabilization effects of dredged sludge by fly ash or phosphogypsum. Adv. Mater. Res. 689, 342-347. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.689.342.
) dredge sludge: 15% lime: 7.5% PG
UCS (28 days curing) - 1966.10 kPa
UCS (90 days curing) - 3028.5 kPa
Dhanasekar et al. (8585. Dhanasekar, K.; Nagarajan, T.N.; Rajarajachozhan, R.; Sriaadith, V.; Vignesh, S. (2021). Stabilization of black cotton soil using lime and phosphogypsum. Int. J. Emerg. Trends Engineer. Res. 9 [4], 503-507. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2021/29942021.
)
OMC & MDD respectively 26 & 1.51 g/cc 1.84 g/cc
Unsoaked & soaked CBR 5.89 & 4.1 respectively

The swelling of expansive soil is the foremost concern as it causes damage to structures. The plasticity index is an indirect indicator of the swelling potential of expansive soil (8080. Chen F.H. (1975) Foundations on Expansive Soils. Elsevier.
). The data tabulated in Table 2 reveals that PG can be used as a good modifier as it lessens the value of the plasticity index which refers to medium-to-low swelling potential.

It has been observed that the addition of PG flattened the compaction curve, which implied low water sensitivity of the composites, hence increasing the strength parameters. The strength increment of treated soil was caused by the formation of calcium silicate hydrate, calcium aluminate hydrate gel and ettringite when the soil stabilised chemically in a high alkali environment (8686. Shen, W.; Zhou, M.; Zhao, Q. (2007) Study on lime-fly ash-phosphogypsum binder. Constr. Build. Mater. 21 [7], 1480-1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.07.010.
). The pozzolanic and hydration reaction absorbed a large quantity of water, so the moisture content of the soil decreased as a consequence, solving the key problem of highly plastic clay or water-sensitive clay when treated by cement/ lime, FA and PG, but the strength increased up to a certain limit of additives, then decreased. This may be caused by the unreacted lime, which acts as filler material and also increases the pH value, subsequently reducing the shear strength (4545. Mashifana, T.P.; Okonta, F.N.; Ntuli, F. (2018) Geotechnical properties and microstructure of lime-fly ash-phosphogypsum-stabilized soil. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2018, 3640868. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3640868.
, 8787. Chew, S.H.; Kamruzzaman, A.H.M.; Lee, F.H. (2004) Physicochemical and engineering behavior of cement treated clays. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 [7], 696-706. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:7(696).
, 8888. Du, Y-J.; Jiang, N-J.; Liu, S-Y.; Jin. F.; Singh, D.N.; Puppala, A.J. (2014) Engineering properties and microstructural characteristics of cement-stabilized zinc-contaminated kaolin. Can. Geotech. J. 51, 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0177.
). The presence of gypsum in PG activates the pozzolanic reaction in the presence of a hydraulic binder that contains high-level hydroxyl (OH-) ions also released from lime or cement at the time of hydration at a higher pH value. As this reaction is a slow process, a longer curing period helps to generate more strength. The integrated particles are formed due to sorption, cementation and cation exchange between the PG and other additive materials (7171. Babu, R.D.; Raviteja, K.V.N.S.; Varaprasad, L.N.V.N. (2019) Strength characterization of expansive soil treated with phosphogypsum and crumb waste rubber. In: Geo-Congress 2019. ASCE, Reston, VA, pp 315-324.
, 8989. Hunter, D. (1988) Lime-induced heave in sulfate-bearing slay soils. J. Geoteh. Eng. 114 [2], 150-167. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:2(150).
, 9090. E.M. Gartner (2002) Hydration of Portland cement. In: Structure and performance of cements. CRC Press, 75-131.
). The consumption of hydroxyl (OH-) ions produces ettringite, due to which the overall pH of the composite decreased with the increase of PG content. But the lowest value of pH ended at 10.9 after 28 days of curing, which is itself a good alkaline environment for the future pozzolanic reaction (9191. Zeng, L-L.; Bian, X.; Zhao, L.; Wng, Y.J.; Hong, J.S. (2021) Effect of phosphogypsum on physiochemical and mechanical behaviour of cement stabilized dredged soil from Fuzhou, China. Geomech. Energy Environ. 25, 100195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2020.100195.
, 9292. Chrysochoou, M.; Grubb, D.G.; Drengler, K.L.; Malasavage, N.E. (2010) Stabilized dredged material. III: Mineralogical perspective. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 [8], 1037-1050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000292.
). High temperature during the curing period accelerates the early hydration and pozzolanic reaction as well as the intensity of the endotherms of ettringite, which helps to obtain a high strength value (2222. Mashifana, T.; Okonta, F.N.; Ntuli, F. (2018) Geotechnical properties and application of lime modified phosphogypsum waste. Mater. Sci. 24 [3], 312-318 https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ms.24.3.18232.
). The stabilisation and curing of PG transform it from an acidic to alkaline composite because of the hydroxide component that decreased the plasticity and increased the sustained pozzolanic reaction, which helps to achieve long-term strength (9393. Little DN (1999) Evaluation of structural properties of lime stabilized soils and aggregates. National Lime Association.
). With the increase in curing time, the PG content reduced the moisture content because the reaction between PG and calcium aluminate hydrate demanded a large amount of water (9494. Lorenzo, G.A.; Bergado, D.T. (2004) Fundamental parameters of cement-admixed clay-New approach. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 [10], 1042-1050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:10(1042).
). Xue et al. (2019) studied the ability of PG to reduce the alkalinity of waste material like RM and to make it suitable for agricultural purposes and other comprehensive use. They found that an optimum quantity of 2% PG with a liquid/solid ratio of 2 mL/g at 30 °C for a reaction time of 12 h reduced the pH of RM from 12 to 8.1 and transformed the loose granular structure of RM into a large aggregate structure (9595. Xue, S.; Li, M.; Jiang, J.; Millar, G.J.; Li, C.; Kong, X. (2019) Phosphogypsum stabilization of bauxite residue: Conversion of its alkaline characteristics. J. Env. Sci. 77, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2018.05.016.
). The lower pH value restricted its use alone, although at the same time this property makes it suitable for reducing the alkalinity of a material to enable its use in essential purposes. Wang et al. (2019) studied the effects of earthquake action based on liquefaction and deformation affecting the groundwater on a PG tailings pond by using FLAC3D. The study revealed that the tailings slipped along the shear strain zone because liquefaction of saturated tailings during dynamic loading led to overtopping failure (9696. Wang, T.; He, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wang, S. (2019) Dynamic stability analysis of the Laizigou phosphogypsum tailings pond. In: 53rd US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, American Rock Mechanics Association.
). Rong et al. (2020) used hemihydrate PG for mine filling because of its cementitious properties, conducting laboratory tests verified by industrial experiments on the goaf filling; it decreased the surface subsidence and strengthened the stability of the surrounding rocks, which may enable the extraction of more resources. They also observed that the underground construction could proceed faster due to the rapid consolidation rate (9797. Rong, K.; Lan, W.; Li, H. (2020) Industrial experiment of goaf filling using the filling materials based on hemihydrate phosphogypsum. Minerals. 10 [4], 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10040324.
). Gaidajis et al. (2017) conducted laboratory experiments to find the potential of PG in quarry and mine fillings. The test results showed that PG can be compacted easily and exhibits the desired strength and compressibility values. It was suggested that the leachability of heavy metals was within permissible limits, thus making it suitable for the above-mentioned purposes (1616. Gaidajis, G.; Anagnostopoulos, A.; Garidi, A.; Mylona, E.; Zevgolis, I.E. (2018) Laboratory evaluation of phosphogypsum for alternative uses. Environ. Geotech. 5 [6], 310-323. https://doi.org/10.1680/jenge.16.00040.
). However, AFt (ettringite), while being one of the major sources of strength, also has swelling potential; hence, it was suggested to apply a moderate quantity of PG to control the swelling of stabilised soil (9898. Pollard, S.J.T.; Montgomery, D.M.; Sollars, C.J.; Perry, R. (1991) Organic compounds in the cement-based stabilisation/ solidification of hazardous mixed wastes-Mechanistic and process considerations. J. Hazard. Mater. 28 [3], 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(91)87082-D.
, 9999. Puppala, A.J.; Intharasombat, N.; Vempati, R.K. (2005) Experimental studies on ettringite-induced heaving in soils. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 [3], 325-337. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:3(325).
). The subsequent reactions between the PG and the hydrated products of stabilised soil for the formation of ettringite are shown in Equation [2] and Equation [3] (8989. Hunter, D. (1988) Lime-induced heave in sulfate-bearing slay soils. J. Geoteh. Eng. 114 [2], 150-167. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:2(150).
, 9090. E.M. Gartner (2002) Hydration of Portland cement. In: Structure and performance of cements. CRC Press, 75-131.
):

A l 2 S i 4 O 10 ( O H ) 2 n H 2 O 2 O H - + 10 H 2 O 2 A l O H 4 - + 4 H 4 S i O 4 n H 2 O  [2]
6Ca2+2AL(OH)4-+4OH-+3(SO4)-3+26H2OCa6ALOH62.(SO4)326H2Oettringite   [3]

4.2. Binder

 

Phosphorus pentoxide, fluoride, radionuclides and other organic substances in PG have restricted its application as a retarder in concrete technology (7272. Peaveen, S. (2019) A study on high expensive black cotton soil to find out the properties with the help of mixing other soil stabilising material. Int. J. Bus. Eng. Res. 1-11.
). Bumanis et al. (2018) converted the dihydrate PG to hemihydrate PG (PGH) at elevated temperatures (100‒80 ºC) and observed the binding features as an alternative to gypsum. The binder composite made from PG with slacked lime and plasticisers had a long initial setting time, reduced the water‒PG ratio from 0.8 to 0.43 and had a high compressive strength of 29 MPa for a 14 days hardened sample (4747. Bumanis, G.; Zorica, J.; Bajare, D.; Korjakins, A. (2018) Technological properties of phosphogypsum binder obtained from fertilizer production waste. Energy Proc. 147, 301-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.096.
). Because of the lower AFt content formation compared to lime+gypsum by-product, Huo et al. (2021) advised using slag‒cement with gypsum by-product to resist expansion (100100. Pu, S.; Zhu, Z.; Huo, W. (2021) Evaluation of engineering properties and environmental effect of recycled gypsum stabilized soil in geotechnical engineering: A comprehensive review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 174, 105780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105780.
). Xiao et al. (2019) solidified oily sludge by treating ordinary Portland cement (OPC), FA, and silica fume (SF) as binders with PG as a stabiliser. An optimum combination of binders (OPC: FA: SF = 1: 0.7: 0.8) with PG produced AFt which improved the compressive strength, water stability performance, freeze‒thaw resistance and volumetric stability (4646. Xiao, W.; Yao, X.; Zhang, F. (2019) Recycling of oily sludge as a roadbed material utilizing phosphogypsum-based cementitious materials. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019, 6280715. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6280715.
, 101101. Aboutabikh, M.; Soliman, A.M.; El Naggar, M.H. (2016) Properties of cementitious material incorporating treated oil sands drill cuttings waste. Constr. Build. Mater. 111, 751-757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.163.
, 102102. Jianli, M.; Youcai, Z.; Jinmei, W.; Li, W. (2010). Effect of magnesium oxychloride cement on stabilization/solidification of sewage sludge. Constr. Build. Mater. 24 [1], 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.011.
). The fusions reduce the leachate of heavy metals by refining pores with compact microstructure. The test results confirmed that the final composite can be used for Grade II Highway Sub-base according to the Specification for Construction Technology of Highway Pavement Base. When PG was partially replaced with cement as binding material, the early strength increased. The desired early strength not only reduced the cost of stocking but also enabled its use in the field of application. Fractional replacement of cement also reduced the cost (9090. E.M. Gartner (2002) Hydration of Portland cement. In: Structure and performance of cements. CRC Press, 75-131.
).

5. XRD ANALYSIS

 

Mineralogical changes of raw materials after treatment help to understand the structure and strength of the new composite. These changes depend decisively upon the raw materials, their proportions, curing period and their ambience. The mineralogy of PG is crystalline in form and hence has strength potentiality. When PG is mixed with cementitious materials, the formation of portlandite and ettringite indicates good strength (7878. Farroukh, H.; Mnif, T.; Kamoun, F.; Kamoun, L.; Bennour, F. (2017) Investigation of the strength development in tunisian phosphogypsum-stabilized sensitive clayey soils: Assess of geotechnical properties and environmental impact. ASRJETS. 29 [1], 153-166.
). When clay-rich soil is modified with either treated or raw PG together with other additives, the new form of minerals is different in both cases. Among the three strength compounds of C-S-H, C-A-H and ettringite, the formation intensity of ettringite was greater, which contributed to the early strength development with the addition of PG. Meanwhile, the C-A-H compound was reduced, whereas the C-S-H gel remained unchanged. The ettringite formed bridged the solid particles due to its needle-like structure, and hence improved the strength as well as the density by compressing the pore space of the soil with high water content (8686. Shen, W.; Zhou, M.; Zhao, Q. (2007) Study on lime-fly ash-phosphogypsum binder. Constr. Build. Mater. 21 [7], 1480-1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.07.010.
, 9191. Zeng, L-L.; Bian, X.; Zhao, L.; Wng, Y.J.; Hong, J.S. (2021) Effect of phosphogypsum on physiochemical and mechanical behaviour of cement stabilized dredged soil from Fuzhou, China. Geomech. Energy Environ. 25, 100195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2020.100195.
, 103103. Tremblay, H.; Duchesne, J.; Locat, J.; Leroueil, S. (2002) Influence of the nature of organic compounds on fine soil stabilization with cement. Can. Geotech. J. 39 [3], 535-546. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-002.
). Mashifana et al. (2019) reported the XRD analysis of raw PG, RPG20 (lime, FA, 10% BOF and 20% raw PG), treated PG and TPG20 (lime, FA, 10% BOF and 20% treated PG), as shown in Figure 4 to Figure 6 respectively. In both of these composites, kieserite is the common predominant mineral that has a significant role in high strength (6363 Mashifana, T. (2019) Evaluation of raw and chemically treated waste phosphogypsum and its potential applications. In: Iticescu C, Guo Z (eds) E3S Web of Conferences. p 02004.
). Mashifana et al. (2018) tested expansive soil, rich in montmorillonite 8(KAl4 (SiAl)O10 (OH)4), bentonite (Ca0.06 Na0.21 K0.27) (Al11.64), kaolinite (Al2 (Si2 O5) (OD)4), and quartz (SiO2). When this soil was modified with PG, new hydration products formed; namely calcium magnesium silicide (CaMgSi), sillimanite (Al2 (SiO4)O), kaolinite (Al2 (Si2O5) (OD)4), feldspar (Al2 Si2O8), and trikalsilite ((KNa)AlSiO4). Treated PG helped to dissolve siliceous and aluminous compounds from the soil lattice. These ions reacted with the calcium ions in the pore water to form calcium silicate hydrate and calcium aluminate hydrate, which coated the soil particles. Subsequently, crystallisation bonded them, hence the strength was significantly improved (4545. Mashifana, T.P.; Okonta, F.N.; Ntuli, F. (2018) Geotechnical properties and microstructure of lime-fly ash-phosphogypsum-stabilized soil. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2018, 3640868. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3640868.
, 104104. Sudhakar, M.R.; Shivananda, P. (2005) Role of curing temperature in progress of lime-soil reactions. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 23, 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-003-3157-5.
).

medium/medium-MC-72-347-e288-gf4.png
Figure 4.  XRD analysis of raw PG (reproduced from 7373. Mashifana, T.P.; Okonta, F. N.; Ntuli, F. (2019) Development of low content phosphogypsum waste composites modified by lime-fly ash-basic oxygen furnace slag. Rev. Rom. Mater. 49 [2], 294-302.
).
medium/medium-MC-72-347-e288-gf5.png
Figure 5.  XRD analysis of RPG 20 (reproduced from 7373. Mashifana, T.P.; Okonta, F. N.; Ntuli, F. (2019) Development of low content phosphogypsum waste composites modified by lime-fly ash-basic oxygen furnace slag. Rev. Rom. Mater. 49 [2], 294-302.
).
medium/medium-MC-72-347-e288-gf6.png
Figure 6.  XRD analysis of treated PG and PTG 20 (reproduced from 7373. Mashifana, T.P.; Okonta, F. N.; Ntuli, F. (2019) Development of low content phosphogypsum waste composites modified by lime-fly ash-basic oxygen furnace slag. Rev. Rom. Mater. 49 [2], 294-302.
).

6. CONCLUSIONS.

 

The reuse of locally available waste materials on a large scale in various practical fields is a sign of progress towards achieving sustainable development. The fertiliser industry by-product waste phosphogypsum is acidic and contains trace materials and radioactive nuclides like 226Ra. Therefore, it needs to be either purified or used in different engineering fields with proper guidelines to avoid effects on human health and the environment. Many research studies have been conducted on the use of PG in different fields of civil engineering, like construction material, road base material, and binder and soil stabilisation. All these studies showed that the success of the application of PG largely depends upon the grain sizes, relative consistency, compressibility, and the chemical and mineralogical composition of the material to be treated. The leachate problem and radioactivity problems can be solved to a reasonable extent by treating them with a mild acid. But it can also be concluded that it cannot be used alone due to its acidic behaviour, so it needs to be stabilised with other materials like FA, GGBS, rubber tyre and lime, cement etc. There is another by-product waste, RM obtained from the aluminium industry as an alkaline bauxite residue, and these can neutralise each other because of their opposite characteristics. Future investigations could usefully be attempted by researchers to stabilise the PG with RM and make the mixture suitable for different geotechnical purposes like backfilling of mechanically stabilised earth (MSE) walls, paver blocks, MSE walls, clay liners etc. However, the leaching property of the combined material should still be tested before using it as a construction material due to continuing environmental concerns.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS:

 

Conceptualization: G. Debabrata. Data curation: B. Anamika. Formal analysis: B. Anamika. Investigation: B. Anamika. Methodology: B. Anamika. Supervision: G. Debabrata. Writing, original draft: B. Anamika. Writing, review & editing: G. Debabrata.

REFERENCES

 
1. Vardon, P.J. (2015) Climatic influence on geotechnical infrastructure: a review. Environ. Geotech. 2 [3], 166-174. https://doi.org/10.1680/envgeo.13.00055.
2. Trenberth, K.E. (2011) Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim. Res. 47 [1-2], 123-138. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00953.
3. Tayibi, H.; Gascó, C.; Navarro, N.; López-Delgado, A.; Choura, M.; Alguacil, F.J.; López, F.A. (2011) Radiochemical characterization of phosphogypsum for engineering use. J. Environ. Prot. 02, 168-174. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2011.22019.
4. Saadaoui, E.; Ghazel, N.; Ben Romdhane, C.; Massoudi, N. (2017) Phosphogypsum: potential uses and problems - a review. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 74, 558-567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2017.1330582.
5. Rashad, A.M. (2015) Potential use of phosphogypsum in alkali-activated fly ash under the effects of elevated temperatures and thermal shock cycles. J. Clean. Prod. 87, 717-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.080.
6. Tayibi, H.; Choura, M.; López, F.A.; Alguacil, F.J.; López-Delgado, A. (2009) Environmental impact and management of phosphogypsum. J. Environ. Manage. 90 [8], 2377-2386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.03.007.
7. Singh, M.; Garg, M. (1997) Durability of cementitious binder derived from industrial wastes. Mater. Struct. 30 [10], 607-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02486902.
8. Yang, J.; Liu, W.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, B. (2009) Preparation of load-bearing building materials from autoclaved phosphogypsum. Constr. Build. Mater. 23 [2], 687-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.02.011.
9. Singh, M. (2002) Treating waste phosphogypsum for cement and plaster manufacture. Cem. Concr. Res. 32 [7], 1033-1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00723-8.
10. Garg, M.; Singh, M.; Kumar, R. (1996) Some aspects of the durability of a phosphogypsum-lime-fly ash binder. Constr. Build. Mater. 10 [4], 273-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(95)00085-2.
11. USEPA (2002) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002. National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants, Subpart R.
12. Rashad, A.M. (2017) Phosphogypsum as a construction material. J. Clean. Prod. 166, 732-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.049.
13. Parreira, A.B.; Kobayashi, A.R.K.; Silvestre, O.B. (2003) Influence of portland cement type on unconfined compressive strength and linear expansion of cement-stabilized phosphogypsum. J. Environ. Eng. 129, 956-960. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:10(956).
14. Mishra, C.S.K.; Nayak, S.; Guru, B.C.; Rath, M. (2010) Environmental impact and management of wastes from phosphate fertilizer plants. J. Ind. Pollut. Control. 26 [1], 57-60.
15. Tirado, R.; Allsopp, M. (2012) Phosphorus in agriculture: problems and solutions. Greenpeace Research Laboratories Technical Report (Review).
16. Gaidajis, G.; Anagnostopoulos, A.; Garidi, A.; Mylona, E.; Zevgolis, I.E. (2018) Laboratory evaluation of phosphogypsum for alternative uses. Environ. Geotech. 5 [6], 310-323. https://doi.org/10.1680/jenge.16.00040.
17. SENES Consultants Limited (1987) An analysis of the major environmental and health concerns of phosphogypsum tailings in Canada and methods for their reduction. Alberta Environment, Canada.
18. Wędrychowicz, M.; Bydałek, A.W.; Skrzekut, T.; Noga, P.; Gabryelewicz, I.; Madej, P. (2019) Analysis of the mechanical strength, structure and possibilities of using waste phosphogypsum in aluminum powder composites. SN Appl. Sci. 1 [9], 992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0995-1.
19. Zairi, M.; Rouis, M.J. (1999) Environmental impacts of the storage of phosphogypsum in Sfax (Tunisia). Tunisia.
20. Mesić, M.; Brezinščak, L.; Zgorelec, Ž.; et al. (2016) The application of phosphogypsum in agriculture. Agric. Conspec. Sci. 81 [1], 7-13.
21. Bhawan, P.; Nagar, A. (2014) Guidelines for management and handling of phosphogypsum generated from phosphoric acid plants (Final Draft). Central Pollution Control Board (Ministry of Environment & Forests).
22. Mashifana, T.; Okonta, F.N.; Ntuli, F. (2018) Geotechnical properties and application of lime modified phosphogypsum waste. Mater. Sci. 24 [3], 312-318 https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ms.24.3.18232.
23. Arman, A.; Seals, R.K. (1990) A preliminary assessment of utilization alternatives for phosphogypsum. In: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Phosphogypsum. FL, FIPR Pu. No. 01-060, p. 083, Orlando.
24. Degirmenci, N.; Okucu, A.; Turabi, A. (2007) Application of phosphogypsum in soil stabilization. Build. Environ. 42 [9], 3393-3398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.08.010.
25. Kacimi, L.; Simon-Masseron, A.; Ghomari, A.; Derriche, Z. (2006) Reduction of clinkerization temperature by using phosphogypsum. J. Hazard. Mater. 137 [1], 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.12.053.
26. Folek, S.; Walawska, B.; Wilczek, B.; Miśkiewicz, J. (2011). Use of phosphogypsum in road construction. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 13 [2], 18-22.
27. May, A.; Sweeney, J.W. (1982) Assessment of environmental impacts associated with phosphogypsum in Florid. Florida.
28. Carter, O.C.; Scheiner, B. J. (1992) Investigation of metal and non-metal migration through phosphogypsum. In: AIME proceedings on the symposium on emerging process technologies for a cleaner environment. pp 205-210.
29. Berish, C.W. (1990) Potential environmental hazards of phosphogypsum storage in central Florida. In: Proceedings of the third international symposium on phosphogypsum. FL, FIPR Pub. No. 01060083, Orlando.
30. Reijnders, L. (2007) Cleaner phosphogypsum, coal combustion ashes and waste incineration ashes for application in building materials: A review. Build. Environ. 42 [2], 1036-1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.09.016.
31. Guo, T.; Malone, R.F.; Rusch, K.A. (2001) Stabilized phosphogypsum: class C fly ash: Portland type II cement composites for potential marine application. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 [19], 3967-3973. https://doi.org/10.1021/es010520+.
32. Rajkovic, M.B.; Toskovic, D.V. (2003) Phosphogypsum surface characterisation using scanning electron microscopy. Acta Period. Technol. 34, 61-70. https://doi.org/10.2298/APT0334061R.
33. Lysandrou, M.; Pashalidis, I. (2008) Uranium chemistry in stack solutions and leachates of phosphogypsum disposed at a coastal area in Cyprus. J. Environ. Radioact. 99 [2], 359-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.08.005.
34. Pérez-López, R.; Álvarez-Valero, A.M.; Nieto, J.M. (2007) Changes in mobility of toxic elements during the production of phosphoric acid in the fertilizer industry of Huelva (SW Spain) and environmental impact of phosphogypsum wastes. J. Hazard. Mater. 148 [3], 745-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.068.
35. Rutherford, P.M.; Dudas, M.J.; Samek, R.A. (1994) Environmental impacts of phosphogypsum. Sci. Total Environ. 149 [1-2], 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(94)90002-7.
36. Federal Register 13480. (1990).
37. EPA (1998) Code of Federal Regulations, 1998. Title 40 7: Parts 61.202 and 61.204 (40CFR61.202 and 40CFR61.204.
38. EURATOM Council Directive 96/26 EC. (1996).
39. Federal Register (1999) 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart 61, 64: pp. 5573-5580.
40. Kumar, S. (2002) A perspective study on fly ash-lime-gypsum bricks and hollow blocks for low cost housing development. Constr. Build. Mater. 16, 519-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(02)00034-X.
41. Vásconez-Maza, M.D.; Martínez-Segura, M.A.; Bueso, M.C.; Faz, Á.; García-Nieto, M.C.; Gabarrón, M.; Acosta, J.A. (2019) Predicting spatial distribution of heavy metals in an abandoned phosphogypsum pond combining geochemistry, electrical resistivity tomography and statistical methods. J. Hazard. Mater. 374, 392-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.045.
42. Amrani, M.; Taha, Y.; Kchikach, A.; Benzaazoua, M.; Hakkou, R. (2020) Phosphogypsum recycling: New horizons for a more sustainable road material application. J. Build. Eng. 30, 101267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101267.
43. Farroukh, H.; Mnif, T.; Kamoun, F.; Kamoun, L.; Bennour, F. (2018) Stabilization of clayey soils with Tunisian phosphogypsum: effect on geotechnical properties. Arab. J. Geosci. 11 [23], 760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-4116-z.
44. James, J.; Kasinatha Pandian, P. (2016) Plasticity, swell-shrink, and microstructure of phosphogypsum admixed lime stabilized expansive soil. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2016, 9798456. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9798456.
45. Mashifana, T.P.; Okonta, F.N.; Ntuli, F. (2018) Geotechnical properties and microstructure of lime-fly ash-phosphogypsum-stabilized soil. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2018, 3640868. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3640868.
46. Xiao, W.; Yao, X.; Zhang, F. (2019) Recycling of oily sludge as a roadbed material utilizing phosphogypsum-based cementitious materials. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019, 6280715. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6280715.
47. Bumanis, G.; Zorica, J.; Bajare, D.; Korjakins, A. (2018) Technological properties of phosphogypsum binder obtained from fertilizer production waste. Energy Proc. 147, 301-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.096.
48. Tsioka, M.; Voudrias, E.A. (2020) Comparison of alternative management methods for phosphogypsum waste using life cycle analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 266, 121386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121386.
49. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1990.
50. Landa, E. R. (2007) Naturally occurring radionuclides from industrial sources: characteristics and fate in the environment. In: Radioactivity in the Environment. 211-237.
51. Iqbal, H.; Anwar, B.M.; Hanif, U.; et al. (2015) Leaching of metals, organic carbon and nutrients from municipal waste under semi-arid conditions. Int. J. Environ. Res. 9 [1], 187-196.
52. Rusch, K.A.; Guo, T.; Seals, R.K. (2002) Stabilization of phosphogypsum using class C fly ash and lime: assessment of the potential for marine applications. J. Hazard. Mater. 93 [2], 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00009-2.
53. Koopman, C. (2001) Purification of gypsum from the phosphoric acid production by recrystallization with simultaneous extraction. PhD. dissertation. DSM Research Geleen Centre for Particle Technology.
54. Singh, M.; Garg, M.; Rehsi, S.S. (1993) Purifying phosphogypsum for cement manufacture. Constr. Build. Mater. 7 [1], 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(93)90018-8.
55. Aly, M.M.; Mohammed, N.A. (1999) Recovery of lanthanides from Abu Tartur phosphate rock, Egypt. Hydrometallurgy. 52 [2], 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(99)00018-3.
56. Singh, M.; Garg, M.; Verma, C.L.; Handa, S.K.; Kumar, R. (1996) An improved process for the purification of phosphogypsum. Constr. Build. Mater. 10 [8], 597-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(96)00019-0.
57. El-Didamony, H.; Ali, M.M.; Awwad, N.; Fawzy, M.M.; Attallah, M. (2012) Treatment of phosphogypsum waste using suitable organic extractants. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 291, 907-914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1547-3.
58. Koopman, C.; Witkamp, G.J. (2002) Ion exchange extraction during continuous recrystallization of CaSO4 in the phosphoric acid production process: lanthanide extraction efficiency and CaSO4 particle shape. Hydrometallurgy. 63 [2], 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(01)00219-5.
59. Santos, E.A.; Ladeira, A.C.Q. (2011) Recovery of uranium from mine waste by leaching with carbonate-based reagents. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 [8], 3591-3597. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2002056.
60. Fernandes, H.M.; Veiga, L.H.S.; Franklin, M.R.; Prado, V.C S.; Taddei, J.F. (1995). Environmental impact assessment of uranium mining and milling facilities: a study case at the Poços de Caldas uranium mining and milling site, Brazil. J. Geochem. Explor. 52 [1-2], 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6742(94)00043-B.
61. Merritt, C.R. (1971) Extractive metallurgy of uraniu. Colorado School of Mines Research Institute.
62. (1997) Congress Catalog Card (No. 71-157076).
63 Mashifana, T. (2019) Evaluation of raw and chemically treated waste phosphogypsum and its potential applications. In: Iticescu C, Guo Z (eds) E3S Web of Conferences. p 02004.
64. Al-Jabbari, S.; Faisal, F.; Ali, S.; Nasir, S. (1988) The physical methods for purification of the phosphogypsum for using it as building material. J. Build. Res. Sci. Res. Council Baghdad. 7, 49-69.
65. Guidelines for management and handling of phosphogypsum generated from phosphoric acid plants (Draft copy) (2012) Central Pollution Control Board New Delhi India. (2012).
66. Campos, M.P.; Costa, L.J.P.; Nisti, M.B.; Mazzilli, B.P. (2017) Phosphogypsum recycling in the building materials industry: assessment of the radon exhalation rate. J. Environ. Radioact. 172, 232-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.04.002.
67. Sivapullaiah, P.V.; Jha, A.K. (2014) Gypsum induced strength behaviour of fly ash-lime stabilized expansive soil. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 32 [5], 1261-1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9799-7.
68. Kumar, S.; Tilak, V.; Dutta, R.K. (2017) Engineering properties of bentonite-lime-phosphogypsum composite reinforced with treated sisal fibers. Period. Polytech-Civ. 61 [3], 554-563. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.8183.
69. Silva, M.V.; de Rezende, L.R.; Mascarenha, M.M.A.; de Oliveira, R.B. (2019) Phosphogypsum, tropical soil and cement mixtures for asphalt pavements under wet and dry environmental conditions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 144, 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.029.
70. Ho, L.S.; Nakarai, K.; Ogawa, Y.; Sasaki, T.; Morioka, M. (2017) Strength development of cement-treated soils: Effects of water content, carbonation, and pozzolanic reaction under drying curing condition. Constr. Build. Mater. 134, 703-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.065.
71. Babu, R.D.; Raviteja, K.V.N.S.; Varaprasad, L.N.V.N. (2019) Strength characterization of expansive soil treated with phosphogypsum and crumb waste rubber. In: Geo-Congress 2019. ASCE, Reston, VA, pp 315-324.
72. Peaveen, S. (2019) A study on high expensive black cotton soil to find out the properties with the help of mixing other soil stabilising material. Int. J. Bus. Eng. Res. 1-11.
73. Mashifana, T.P.; Okonta, F. N.; Ntuli, F. (2019) Development of low content phosphogypsum waste composites modified by lime-fly ash-basic oxygen furnace slag. Rev. Rom. Mater. 49 [2], 294-302.
74. Maazoun, H.; Bouassida, M. (2019) Phosphogypsum management challenges in Tunisia. 88-104.
75. Sudhakar, P.; Ramesh Babu, V.; Ramesh Babu, B. (2016) A study on subgrade characteristics of black cotton soil treated with lime and phosphogypsum. IRJET. 3, 12.
76. Divya Krishnan, K.; Deepika, M.; Ravichandran, P.T.; Sudha, C.; Kottuppillil, A.K. (2016) Study on behaviour of soil with phosphogypsum as stabiliser. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9 [23], 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i23/95980.
77. Kumar Dutta, R.; Khatri, V.N.; Panwar, V. (2017) Strength characteristics of fly ash stabilized with lime and modified with phosphogypsum. J. Build. Eng. 14, 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.09.010.
78. Farroukh, H.; Mnif, T.; Kamoun, F.; Kamoun, L.; Bennour, F. (2017) Investigation of the strength development in tunisian phosphogypsum-stabilized sensitive clayey soils: Assess of geotechnical properties and environmental impact. ASRJETS. 29 [1], 153-166.
79. Devipriya, P.V.; Chandrakaran, S. (2017) Effect of phosphogypsum as a stabilizing agent for swelling clays. J. Recent Advanc. Geotech. Engineer.
80. Chen F.H. (1975) Foundations on Expansive Soils. Elsevier.
81. Bian, X.; Zeng, L.; Ji, F.; Xie, M.; Hong, Z. (2022) Plasticity role in strength behavior of cement-phosphogypsum stabilized soils. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. (in press) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.01.003.
82. Satyaveni, B.; Sridevi, K.; Sivanarayana, C.; Prasad, D.S. (2018) A study on strength characteristics of baggasse ash and phospho gypsum treated marine clay. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 5 [7], 11-16.
83. Harrou, A.; Gharibi, E.; Nasri, H.; Fagel, N.; El Ouahabi, M. (2020) Physico-mechanical properties of phosphogypsum and black steel slag as aggregate for bentonite-lime based materials. Mater. Today Proc. 31, S51-S55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.819.
84. Yu, Z.H.; Gui, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Kong, X.Y. (2013) Experimental study on the stabilization effects of dredged sludge by fly ash or phosphogypsum. Adv. Mater. Res. 689, 342-347. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.689.342.
85. Dhanasekar, K.; Nagarajan, T.N.; Rajarajachozhan, R.; Sriaadith, V.; Vignesh, S. (2021). Stabilization of black cotton soil using lime and phosphogypsum. Int. J. Emerg. Trends Engineer. Res. 9 [4], 503-507. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2021/29942021.
86. Shen, W.; Zhou, M.; Zhao, Q. (2007) Study on lime-fly ash-phosphogypsum binder. Constr. Build. Mater. 21 [7], 1480-1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.07.010.
87. Chew, S.H.; Kamruzzaman, A.H.M.; Lee, F.H. (2004) Physicochemical and engineering behavior of cement treated clays. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 [7], 696-706. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:7(696).
88. Du, Y-J.; Jiang, N-J.; Liu, S-Y.; Jin. F.; Singh, D.N.; Puppala, A.J. (2014) Engineering properties and microstructural characteristics of cement-stabilized zinc-contaminated kaolin. Can. Geotech. J. 51, 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0177.
89. Hunter, D. (1988) Lime-induced heave in sulfate-bearing slay soils. J. Geoteh. Eng. 114 [2], 150-167. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:2(150).
90. E.M. Gartner (2002) Hydration of Portland cement. In: Structure and performance of cements. CRC Press, 75-131.
91. Zeng, L-L.; Bian, X.; Zhao, L.; Wng, Y.J.; Hong, J.S. (2021) Effect of phosphogypsum on physiochemical and mechanical behaviour of cement stabilized dredged soil from Fuzhou, China. Geomech. Energy Environ. 25, 100195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2020.100195.
92. Chrysochoou, M.; Grubb, D.G.; Drengler, K.L.; Malasavage, N.E. (2010) Stabilized dredged material. III: Mineralogical perspective. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 [8], 1037-1050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000292.
93. Little DN (1999) Evaluation of structural properties of lime stabilized soils and aggregates. National Lime Association.
94. Lorenzo, G.A.; Bergado, D.T. (2004) Fundamental parameters of cement-admixed clay-New approach. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 [10], 1042-1050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:10(1042).
95. Xue, S.; Li, M.; Jiang, J.; Millar, G.J.; Li, C.; Kong, X. (2019) Phosphogypsum stabilization of bauxite residue: Conversion of its alkaline characteristics. J. Env. Sci. 77, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2018.05.016.
96. Wang, T.; He, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wang, S. (2019) Dynamic stability analysis of the Laizigou phosphogypsum tailings pond. In: 53rd US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, American Rock Mechanics Association.
97. Rong, K.; Lan, W.; Li, H. (2020) Industrial experiment of goaf filling using the filling materials based on hemihydrate phosphogypsum. Minerals. 10 [4], 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10040324.
98. Pollard, S.J.T.; Montgomery, D.M.; Sollars, C.J.; Perry, R. (1991) Organic compounds in the cement-based stabilisation/ solidification of hazardous mixed wastes-Mechanistic and process considerations. J. Hazard. Mater. 28 [3], 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(91)87082-D.
99. Puppala, A.J.; Intharasombat, N.; Vempati, R.K. (2005) Experimental studies on ettringite-induced heaving in soils. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 [3], 325-337. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:3(325).
100. Pu, S.; Zhu, Z.; Huo, W. (2021) Evaluation of engineering properties and environmental effect of recycled gypsum stabilized soil in geotechnical engineering: A comprehensive review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 174, 105780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105780.
101. Aboutabikh, M.; Soliman, A.M.; El Naggar, M.H. (2016) Properties of cementitious material incorporating treated oil sands drill cuttings waste. Constr. Build. Mater. 111, 751-757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.163.
102. Jianli, M.; Youcai, Z.; Jinmei, W.; Li, W. (2010). Effect of magnesium oxychloride cement on stabilization/solidification of sewage sludge. Constr. Build. Mater. 24 [1], 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.011.
103. Tremblay, H.; Duchesne, J.; Locat, J.; Leroueil, S. (2002) Influence of the nature of organic compounds on fine soil stabilization with cement. Can. Geotech. J. 39 [3], 535-546. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-002.
104. Sudhakar, M.R.; Shivananda, P. (2005) Role of curing temperature in progress of lime-soil reactions. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 23, 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-003-3157-5.