1. INTRODUCTION
⌅Fiber
Reinforced Polymer (FRP) materials are used in the construction
industry as relatively new materials for purposes such as new
construction, retrofitting, or seismic improvement (1-41.
Hosseini, S.M.; Mostofinejad, D. (2021) Seismic performance of RC short
columns retrofitted with a novel system in shear and flexure using CFRP
composites. J. Compos. Constr. 25 [5]. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001148.
2.
Ali, O.; Bigaud, D.; Riahi, H.S. (2018) Seismic performance of
reinforced concrete frame structures strengthened with FRP laminates
using a reliability-based advanced approach. Compos. B. Eng. 139, 238-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.051.
3. Hadigheh, S.A.; Mahini, S.S.; Maheri, M.R. (2014) Seismic behavior of FRP-Retrofitted reinforced concrete frames. J. Earthq. Eng. 18 [8], 1171-1197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2014.926301.
4.
Attari, N.; Youcef, Y.S.; Amziane, S. (2019) Seismic performance of
reinforced concrete beam-column joint strengthening by frp sheets. Struct. 20, 353-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.04.007.
).
FRP or composite rebars are produced from the combination of fibers and
a matrix (resin coating) and have many advantages, including high
tensile strength, light weight, corrosion resistance, insulation in
magnetic and electric fields, and easy application such as convenient
transportation, cutting and installation. The weak points of these
rebars are their sensitivity to heat and low shear strength. Among the
types of FRP rebars, Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) rebars are
considered the most widely used and consumed. Sand-blasted Glass Fiber
Reinforced Polymer (SGFRP) rebar is the same GFRP rebar that is coated
with sand during production. This work can increase the adhesion
strength of rebar to concrete.
On the other hand, due to their
large volume, waste materials have become a big problem worldwide, and
the reuse of these recycled materials in the construction industry can
help to solve this problem (5-75.
Schützenhofer, S.; Kovacic, I.; Rechberger, H.; Mack, S. (2022)
Improvement of environmental sustainability and circular economy through
construction waste management for material reuse. Sustain. 14 [17], 11087. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711087.
6.
Lamba, P.; Kaur, D.P.; Raj, S.; Sorout, J. (2022) Recycling/reuse of
plastic waste as construction material for sustainable development: a
review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29, 86156-86179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16980-y.
7. Terro, M. (2006) Properties of concrete made with recycled crushed glass at elevated temperatures. Build. Environ. 41 [5], 633-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.02.018.
).
The use of waste materials such as micro-silica, glass, and rubber in
concrete is one of the practical methods of reusing these materials,
which improves some of the mechanical and dynamic properties of concrete
and is effective in changing its performance (8-128.
Youssf, O.; Hassanli, R.; Mills, J.E.; Skinner, W.; Ma, X.; Zhuge, Y.;
Roychand, R.; Gravina, R. (2019) Influence of mixing procedures, rubber
treatment, and fibre additives on rubcrete performance. J. Compos. Scien. 3 [2], 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs3020041.
9.
Hassanli, R.; Youssf, O.; Mills, J.E. (2017) Experimental
investigations of reinforced rubberised concrete structural members. J. Build. Eng. 10, 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.03.006.
10.
Al-Tayeb, M.M.; Bakar, B.A.; Ismail, H.; Akil, H.M. (2013) Effect of
partial replacement of sand by recycled fine crumb rubber on the
performance of hybrid rubberised -normal concrete under impact load:
Experiment and simulation. J. Clean. Prod. 59, 284-289.
11.
Youssf, O.; ElGawady, M.A.; Mills, J.E. (2015) Experimental
investigation of crumb rubber concrete columns under seismic loading. Struct. 3, 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.02.005.
12. Youssf, O.; ElGawady, M.A.; Mills, J.E. (2016) Static cyclic behaviour of FRP-confined crumb rubber concrete columns. Eng. Struct. 113, 371-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.033.
). In the following, the use of recycled materials in reinforced concrete with FRP and steel rebars has been investigated.
Many
researchers have used FRP rebars as an alternative to traditional steel
rebars in reinforced concrete members subjected to uniform and cyclic
loading (1313.
Murad, Y.; Tarawneh, A.; Arar, F.; Al-Zu’bi, A.; Al-Ghwairi, A.;
Al-Jaafreh, A.; Tarawneh, M. (2021) Flexural strength prediction for
concrete beams reinforced with FRP bars using gene expression
programming. Struct. 33, 3163-3172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.045.
). Using these products mutually and continuously will lead to a sustainable and economical construction system (1414.
Falah Hassan, H.; Kadhim Medhlom, M.; Sinan Ahmed, A.; Husein
Al-Dahlaki, M. (2020) Flexural performance of concrete beams reinforced
by GFRP bars and strengthened by CFRP sheets. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 13, e00417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00417.
).
A number of researchers have investigated the behavior of beams
reinforced with FRP bars and made of normal strength concrete (NSC) or
high-strength concrete (HSC) and different concretes under flexural
loading (15-2215.
Al-Sunna, R.; Pilakoutas, K.; Hajirasouliha, I.; Guadagnini, M. (2012)
Deflection behaviour of FRP reinforced concrete beams and slabs: an
experimental investigation. Compos. B. Eng. 43 [5], 2125-2134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.007.
16.
Yang, J.M.; Min, K.H.; Shin, H.O.; Yoon, Y.S. (2012) Effect of steel
and synthetic fibers on flexural behavior of high-strength concrete beams
reinforced with FRP bars. Compos. B. Eng. 43 [3], 1077-1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.044.
17.
El-Nemr, A.; Ahmed, E.A.; Benmokrane, B. (2013) Flexural behavior and
serviceability of normal-and high-strength concrete beams reinforced
with glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars. ACI. Struct. J. 110 [6], 1077. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256287944.
18.
Yoo, D.Y.; Banthia, N.; Yoon, Y.S. (2016) Flexural behavior of
ultra-high-performance fiber reinforced concrete beams reinforced with
GFRP and steel rebars. Eng. Struct. 111, 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.003.
19.
El-Nemr, A.; Ahmed, E.A.; Barris, C.; Benmokrane, B. (2016)
Bond-dependent coeffcient of glass-and carbon-FRP bars in normal-and
high-strength concretes. Constr. Build. Mater. 113, 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.005.
20.
Rahman, S.H.; Mahmoud, K.; El-Salakawy, E. (2016) Behavior of glass
fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete continuous T-beams. J. Compos. Constr. 21 [2], 04016085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000740.
21. Duic, J.; Kenno, S.; Das, S. (2018) Performance of concrete beams reinforced with basalt fibre composite rebar. Constr. Build. Mater. 176, 470-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.208.
22.
Abdelkarim, O.I.; Ahmed, E.A.; Mohamed, H.M.; Benmokrane, B. (2019)
Flexural strength and serviceability evaluation of concrete beams
reinforced with deformed GFRP bars. Eng. Struct. 186, 282-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.024.
). Hama et al. (2323.
Hama, S.M.; Mahmoud, A.S.; Yassen, M.M. (2019) Flexural behavior of
reinforced concrete beam incorporating waste glass powder. Struct. 20, 510-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.05.012.
)
have investigated the effect of using waste glass powder as a
substitute for cement weight percentages with values of 0% (reference),
10%, and 15%, as well as the structural behavior of reinforced concrete
beams containing waste glass powder. In this research, concrete beams
(width 150 mm, height 150 mm and span length 900 mm) were used. The
results showed that the beams containing waste glass powder showed good
strength and satisfactory bending performance compared to the reference
beams. Eisa et al. (2424.
Eisa, A.S.; Elshazli, M.T.; Nawar, M.T. (2020) Experimental
investigation on the effect of using crumb rubber and steel fibers on the
structural behavior of reinforced concrete beams. 252, 119078. Constr. Buid. Mater.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119078.
)
investigated the effect of the combination of waste crumb rubber
ranging in size between 2 and 3 mm and hooked-end steel fibers with a
diameter of 0.80 mm and length of 50 mm with a tensile strength of 1000
MPa and elastic modulus of 210 GPa on the behavior of reinforced
concrete beams under static loads by four-point bending test. Crumb
rubber with different weight percentages (5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) has
been a partial replacement of fine aggregates in the mixture of normal
concrete and concrete containing steel fibers. The volume amount of
steel fibers is kept constant at 1%. The test results showed that the
use of crumb rubber as a relative substitute of fine aggregates at the
rate of 5% and 10% shows an acceptable performance of reinforced
concrete beams. The use of steel fibers with rubber concrete with a
rubber percentage of more than 10% improved the performance and
toughness of these mixtures. Shahjalal et al. (2525.
Shahjalal, M.D.; Islam, K.; Rahman, J.; Ahmed, K.S.; Karim, M.R.;
Billah, A.M. (2021) Flexural response of fiber reinforced concrete beams
with waste tires rubber and recycled aggregate. 278, 123842. J. Clean. Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123842.
)
investigated the combined effect of recycled aggregates, crumb rubber
and polypropylene fibers with specific gravity of 0.91 g/cm3,
length of 12 mm, tensile strength of 480 MPa, and elastic modulus of 7
GPa with contents at 0.5% on the physical and mechanical properties of
concrete. Fourteen specimens of reinforced concrete beams with
dimensions of 150×200×1500 (mm) were made and tested. Several mixing
plans in which the variables included 5% and 10% crumb rubber and steel
ratio 0.59% and 1.60% and recycled coarse aggregates and polypropylene
fibers were kept constant at 30% and 0.5%, respectively. The results of
the experimental study show the improvement of short-term and long-term
mechanical properties of concretes containing crumb rubber and
polypropylene fibers. Concrete beams with 30% recycled coarse
aggregates, 5% crumb rubber, and 0.5% polypropylene fibers improved
bending capacity, ductility and toughness. Ismail and Hassan (2626.
Ismail, M.K.; Hassan, A.A.A. (2017) An experimental study on flexural
behaviour of large-scale concrete beams incorporating crumb rubber and
steel fibres. j. Eng. Struct. 145, 97-108. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.018.
)
developed twelve concrete beams to investigate the effect of crumb
rubber with and without steel fibers on the bending behavior of
large-scale beams. The main parameters included the percentage of rubber
particles (0-35% of sand volume), the volume of steel fibers (0, 35%
and 1%), and the length of steel fibers (35 mm and 60 mm). The results
showed that the increase in rubber particles reduces the width of the
crack, reduces the weight of the concrete itself and improves the
deformation at a given load. For example, the beam with 15% crumb rubber
was able to reach an ultimate load, ductility, and toughness of about
90%, 102%, and 91% of the reference beam, respectively. In contrast, the
addition of a high percentage of crumb rubber (more than 15%) showed a
significant decrease in ductility, toughness, first crack moment and
ultimate bending capacity of the tested beams. Erfan et al. (2727.
Erfan, A.M.; Hassan, H.E.; Khalil, M.H.; El-Sayed, T.A. (2020) The
flexural behavior of nano concrete and high strength concrete usingGFRP. Constr. Build. Mater. 247, 1188664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118664.
)
investigated the bending behavior of concrete beams reinforced with
GFRP polymer rebars in mixtures of nano-silica concrete and
high-strength concrete. The results show that the breaking and
displacement loads of beams reinforced with GFRP rebars have increased
by 22% and 6.5 times, respectively, compared to beams with steel rebars
and concrete containing nano-silica. Cracks along the length and width
of the GFRP beams were also reduced. Also, the first crack force of
beams reinforced with GFRP bars shows a reduction of 8.5% compared to
beams with steel bars. De sá et al. (2828.
De Sá, F.R.G.; Silva, F.d.A.; Cardoso, D.C.T. (2020) Tensile and
flexural performance of concrete members reinforced with polypropylene
fibers and GFRP bars. Compos. Struct. 253, 112784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112784.
)
investigated the behavior of reinforced concrete beam with GFRP rebars
and polypropylene macro-fibers. The polypropylene macro-fibers used in
this research are 51 mm long with an aspect ratio of 74. A reinforcement
ratio of 10 kg/m3 of polypropylene fiber was used throughout
this research, corresponding to a volume fraction of approximately 1%.
The modulus of elasticity and tensile strength are respectively 9.5 GPa
and 600-650 MPa. The results showed that in structural concrete beams,
the addition of polypropylene macro-fibers increased stiffness by about
10% and the concrete ultimate strains by up to 40%. This latter
phenomenon led to an increase in ductility up to 162%, which showed that
the addition of macro-polypropylene fibers is a suitable strategy in
overcoming some of the weaknesses of GFRP reinforced concrete members.
Arunbalaji et al. (2929.
Arunbalaji, G.; Nanthakumar, N.; Suganya, R. (2017) Behaviour of
reinforced concrete beam containing micro-silica and nano-silica. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 48 [3], 140-146. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V48P225.
)
investigated the mechanical properties of cement concrete with and
without micro-silica and nano-silica particles. The water-cement ratio
of concrete mixtures was a constant value of 0.53. The amount of
micro-silica replacing cement in this research was 10% and added
nano-silica was 0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5%. The development of mechanical
strength showed that replacing 10% of micro-silica and adding 0.5% of
nano-silica was the optimal ratio. El-Mandouh et al. (3030.
El-Mandouh, M.A.; Kaloop, M.R.; Hu, J.W.; Abd El-Maula, A.S. (2022)
Shear strength of nano-silica high-strength reinforced concrete beams. Mater. 15 [11], 3755. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113755.
)
investigated the shear strength of sixteen full-scale over-reinforced
concrete beams with and without nano-silica made of high-strength
concrete in both experimental and analytical ways. Nano-silica was used
as a partial replacement for Portland cement. The experimental results
showed that increasing the ratio of nano-silica, decreased the number of
cracks and increased the distance between cracks while decreasing the
crack width. For specimens with stirrups and a Shear span to effective
depth ratios of 1.5, raising nano-silica from 0% to 1%, 2%, and 3%
increased the ultimate load by 8%, 21%, and 30%, respectively.
Additionally, the addition of nano-silica to concrete boosted the
contribution of the concrete to the shear strength. Jafari et al. (3131.
Jafari, R.; Alizadeh Elizei, M.H.; Ziaei, M.; Esmaeil Abadi, R. (2022)
Laboratory study of mechanical performance of concrete containing waste
glass and rubber at high temperature. Modar. Civ. Eng. J. 23 [1], 179-192. https://doi.org/10.22034/23.1.12.
),
in a laboratory study, investigated the replacement of rubber and glass
with concrete aggregate and cement. In this study, rubber with two
sizes of fine and coarse aggregate with ratios of 5% and 10% and glass
powder with ratios of 10%, 15%, and 20% were added together and with
different mixing plans in the reference concrete. The results showed
that this replacement reduced the compressive strength and increased the
tensile strength. In concrete containing 5% coarse rubber (5-10 mm) and
10% glass powder, the compressive strength decreased by 12% and the
tensile strength increased by 28% compared to the reference concrete.
Also, in concrete containing 5% fine rubber (1-3 mm) and 10% glass
powder, the compressive strength has decreased by 30% compared to the
reference concrete. The optimal percentage of replacement values were 5%
for rubber and 10% for glass.
In this present laboratory
research, 13 concrete beams have been made from 10 different mixing
plans, and the effect of substituting glass powder and micro-silica
instead of cement and glass crumb instead of fine aggregate and crumb
rubber instead of fine and coarse aggregate in concrete beams reinforced
with GFRP, SGFRP and steel rebars have been investigated. The variables
of this research include the type of rebar, the size of replacement
rubber, the size of replacement glass and the types of combinations
glass, rubber and micro-silica in the beams concrete. According to
previous studies (23-2723.
Hama, S.M.; Mahmoud, A.S.; Yassen, M.M. (2019) Flexural behavior of
reinforced concrete beam incorporating waste glass powder. Struct. 20, 510-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.05.012.
24.
Eisa, A.S.; Elshazli, M.T.; Nawar, M.T. (2020) Experimental
investigation on the effect of using crumb rubber and steel fibers on the
structural behavior of reinforced concrete beams. 252, 119078. Constr. Buid. Mater.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119078.
25.
Shahjalal, M.D.; Islam, K.; Rahman, J.; Ahmed, K.S.; Karim, M.R.;
Billah, A.M. (2021) Flexural response of fiber reinforced concrete beams
with waste tires rubber and recycled aggregate. 278, 123842. J. Clean. Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123842.
26.
Ismail, M.K.; Hassan, A.A.A. (2017) An experimental study on flexural
behaviour of large-scale concrete beams incorporating crumb rubber and
steel fibres. j. Eng. Struct. 145, 97-108. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.018.
27.
Erfan, A.M.; Hassan, H.E.; Khalil, M.H.; El-Sayed, T.A. (2020) The
flexural behavior of nano concrete and high strength concrete usingGFRP. Constr. Build. Mater. 247, 1188664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118664.
, 29-3129.
Arunbalaji, G.; Nanthakumar, N.; Suganya, R. (2017) Behaviour of
reinforced concrete beam containing micro-silica and nano-silica. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 48 [3], 140-146. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V48P225.
30.
El-Mandouh, M.A.; Kaloop, M.R.; Hu, J.W.; Abd El-Maula, A.S. (2022)
Shear strength of nano-silica high-strength reinforced concrete beams. Mater. 15 [11], 3755. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113755.
31.
Jafari, R.; Alizadeh Elizei, M.H.; Ziaei, M.; Esmaeil Abadi, R. (2022)
Laboratory study of mechanical performance of concrete containing waste
glass and rubber at high temperature. Modar. Civ. Eng. J. 23 [1], 179-192. https://doi.org/10.22034/23.1.12.
, 3232.
Sadiqul Islam, G.M.; Rahman, M.H.; Kazi, M. (2017) Waste glass powder
as partial replacement of cement for sustainable concrete practice. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 6 [1], 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.10.005.
, 3333.
Gupta, T.; Chaudhary, S.; Sharma, A.K. (2015) Mechanical and durability
properties of waste rubber fiber concrete with and without silica fume. J. Clean. Prod. 112 [1], 702-711. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.081.
),
the size of the rubber used in concrete in this research is in two
categories: 0 to 5 mm and 5 to 10 mm, which has been replaced by fine
and coarse aggregate in the separate mixing plan with a replacement
value of 5%. The size of glass powder used in concrete is maximum 75
microns, which is replaced by 10% of cement, and the size of glass crumb
used is in the range of 0 to 5 mm, which is replaced by 5% of fine
aggregate. The size of micro-silica used in concrete is about 0.05 to
0.2 micron, which is replaced by 10% of cement.
One of the main objectives of this research is to obtain an optimal mixing plan of recycled materials in reinforced concrete beam with GFRP rebars to increase its bending strength and ductility. Investigating the behavior of beams reinforced with GFRP rebars containing recycled materials in concrete is one of the other objectives. On the other hand, concrete made with recycled materials can help the environment due to the use of recycled materials while reducing the cost of making concrete by using less raw materials in building constructions.
2. EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
⌅The experimental program in this research includes the construction of three groups of reinforced concrete beams with GFRP, SGFRP composite rebars and steel rebars, from 10 different mixing plans.
2.1. Material specifications
⌅2.1.1. Aggregates (sand and gravel)
⌅The
aggregates used in concrete should be in such a way that they can be
used to make concrete with sufficient strength, durability in aggressive
environmental conditions, suitable consistency and workability (3434.
Iranian Concrete Code (ABA) - Second revision, (1400), Department of
technical and executive affairs of the country, Plan and Budget
Organization, Iran.
). Besides, aggregate skeleton is essential for having volumetric stability.
The
fine aggregate (sand) used is broken type, with a maximum size of 4.75
mm. The test of specific gravity and water absorption of fine aggregate
materials has been carried out according to ASTM C128 (3535.
ASTM C128-22 (2022). Standard test method for relative density
(specific gravity) and absorption of fine aggregate. American Society
for Testing and Materials (ASTM). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0128-22.
). The specific gravity SSD of sand is 2.56 g/cm3 and its apparent specific gravity is 1.65 g/cm3 and its water absorption is 2.83% and also the fineness modulus of sand is 3.25.
The
coarse aggregate (gravel) used with the largest nominal size is 19 mm
for gravel 3/4” and 9.5 mm for gravel 3/8”. The test of specific gravity
and water absorption of coarse aggregate materials has been carried out
according to ASTM C127 (3636.
ASTM C127-15 (2015). Standard test method for relative density
(specific gravity) and absorption of coarse aggregate. American Society
for Testing and Materials (ASTM). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0127-15.
). The specific gravity SSD of 3/4” and 3/8” gravel is 2.58 g/cm3 and 2.57 g/cm3, their apparent specific gravity is 1.62 g/cm3 and 1.61 g/cm3,
their water absorption is 1.56% and 1.83% have been obtained,
respectively. The ratio of fine aggregate to coarse aggregate was 1.25
to 1 by weight. The granulation curve of sand and gravel used in
concrete is presented in Figure 1.
2.1.2. Cement
⌅The
cement used in this experiment is Portland cement type 2 or modified
Portland cement. This cement has a specific weight of 3.15 g/cm3 and a specific surface area of 3150 cm2/g and an autoclave expansion of 0.046 and a compressive strength in 28 days of 440 kg/cm2 and satisfies all the requirements of ASTM C150 (3737.
ASTM C150-22 (2022). Standard specification for portland cement.
american society for testing and materials. American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0150_C0150M-22.
). The chemical characteristics of cement are given in Table 1.
Composition | Result (%) | Factory standard | ASTM C150 |
---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | 21.11 | Min 20.5 | - |
Al2O3 | 4.48 | Max 5 | Max 6 |
Fe2O3 | 3.91 | Max 5 | Max 6 |
CaO | 63.36 | - | - |
MgO | 1.48 | Max 2.5 | Max 6 |
SO3 | 2.58 | Max 2.9 | Max 3 |
Na2O | 0.43 | - | - |
K2O | 0.48 | - | - |
Loss on Ignition | 2.25 | Max 2.9 | Max 3 |
Insoluble Residue | 0.45 | Max 0.7 | Max 1.5 |
F.CaO | 1.50 | - | - |
C3S | 52.8 | - | - |
C2S | 21.0 | - | - |
C3A | 5.3 | - | Max 8 |
2.1.3. Rubber
⌅Rubber are different in terms of ingredients, especially due to the amount of natural and synthetic rubber in them (3838.
Sgobba, S.; Borsa, M.; Molfetta, M.; Carlo Marano, G. (2015) Mechanical
performance and medium-term degradation of rubberized concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 98, 820-831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.095.
).
The crumb rubber was prepared from the mechanical grinding of waste
truck tires without any pollution or modification. As shown in Figure 2, the crumb rubber had two size categories: 0-5 mm and 5-10 mm with a specific weight of 1.05 g/cm3.
These were used as a substitute for part of the fine and coarse
aggregates. Water absorption of both size categories of rubber particles
is considered insignificant. The chemical characteristics of rubber
particles used in the research are given in Table 2.
Chemical composition | Percentage (%) |
---|---|
Styrene Butadiene Rubber (SBR) | 49.0 |
Carbon Black | 46.0 |
Extender Oil | 1.8 |
Zinc Oxide | 1.2 |
Stearic Acid | 0.5 |
Sulphur | 0.8 |
Accelerator | 0.7 |
2.1.4. Glass
⌅Glass
can be used in concrete in three ways: coarse aggregate, fine aggregate
and glass powder, each of which can have different reactions with the
composition of concrete and lead to a significant effect on the quality
of concrete obtained (3939.
Kiani Oskooi, R.; Maleki, A. (2018) Investigation of the effect of
glass powder waste with different granulation of stone materials on
concrete strength. Tabriz, Confer.Civ. Eng. 1397, 1.
).
In this experiment, recycled glass obtained from building glass was
used, which does not contain impurities and other types of glass, such
as bottle glass, lamps, etc. As shown in Figure 3,
glass powder and glass crumb are used in this research. The specifics
of these two groups are as follows; glass powder maximum size are 75
microns (passing a 200 grade sieve) with a specific surface area of 2618
cm2/g and a specific weight of 2.94 g/cm2, while
the glass crumb are 0-5 mm in size, with the same grain size as sand.
Glass powder has been used as a part of cement and glass crumb have been
used as a part of fine aggregate of concrete. The chemical
characteristics of the glass used in the research are shown in Table 3.
Composition | Result(%) | Heavy metal | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | 71.5 | Analysis | Limit | Test |
Al2O3 | 0.7 | (ppm) | ||
Na2O | 13.3 | Lead | 200 | 25 |
Fe2 O3 | 0.4 | Cadmium | 200 | - |
CaO | 7.6 | Mercury | 200 | - |
MgO | 5.5 | Hexavalent Chromium (Cr6+) | 200 | - |
K2O | <0.01 | Arsenic | 200 | 34 |
TiO2 | <0.01 | Antimony | 200 | - |
Loss on Ignition | 1 | Barium | 200 | 25 |
2.1.5. Micro-silica
⌅The
size of micro-silica particles is about 0.05 to 0.2 microns. This
material has a non-crystalline molecular structure (amorphous) and has a
specific surface area of 2×105 cm2/g and an average bulk density of 0.65 g/cm3 and a specific density of 2.2. The specifications of micro-silica comply with ASTM C1240 Standard (4040.
ASTM C1240-20 (2020). Standard specification for silica fume used in
cementitious mixtures. American Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM). https://doi.org/10.1520/C1240-20.
). The chemical specifications of micro-silica are shown in Table (4).
Composition | Result (%) | ASTMC1240 | INSO13278 |
---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | 90-95 | Min, 85% | Min 85% |
Fe2O3 | 0.4-2 | - | - |
CaO | 2-2.3 | - | - |
Al2O3 | 2-2.3 | - | - |
MgO | 0.1-0.9 | - | - |
Moisture Content | 0.5 | Max, 3% | Max, 3% |
Loss on Ignition | 4 | Max, 6% | Max, 6% |
2.1.6. Rebars
⌅The longitudinal rebars used in the experiment are GFRP, SGFRP and steel, all with a diameter of 10 mm. The composite rebars made by pultrusion method and steel rebar are shown in Figure 4. The stirrup rebars used in all the beams are of steel type and have a diameter of 8 mm. The mechanical characteristics of rebars are given in Table 5.
Material properties | GFRP rebar | SGFRP rebar | Steel rebar |
---|---|---|---|
Ultimate Strength (MPa) | 700 | 700 | 400 |
Tension Modulus of Elasticity (GPa) | 55 | 55 | 200 |
Rupture Strain (%) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 10 |
Elongation (%) | 2.2 | 2.2 | 25 |
Rebar diameter (mm) | 10 | 10 | 10 |
2.2. Concrete mixing plans
⌅A concrete mixing plan was designed according to ACI-211.1-91 standard (4141.
ACI-211.1-91. Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal,
heavy weight, and, mas concrete. American Concrete Institute (ACI).
) as a reference concrete with a cement amount of 425 kg/m3 and a water-cement ratio of 0.41. Then glass, rubber and micro-silica
were replaced in the reference concrete according to 10 plans and with
specific percentages.
The replacement method is that in mixing plans containing glass powder, first, 10% is reduced from the cement of the reference concrete mixing plan and the same amount of glass powder is added. In mixing plans containing glass crumb, first, 5% is reduced from the fine aggregate (sand) of the reference concrete mixing plan and the same amount of glass crumb are added. In mixing plans containing micro-silica, first, 10% by weight is reduced from the cement of the reference concrete mixing plan, and the volumetric equivalent of micro-silica is added. The replacement in mixing plans containing fine rubber is that first, 5% is reduced from the fine aggregate (sand) of the reference concrete mixing plan, and fine rubber is added to the same volume ratio. In mixing plans containing coarse rubber, first of the coarse aggregate (3/8” and 3/4” gravel) of the reference concrete mixing plan, according to their ratio, 5% is reduced and coarse rubber is added to the same volume ratio.
The mixing plans are named as follows: P (glass Powder), B (glass crumb), F (Fine rubber) (0-5 mm), C (Coarse rubber) (5-10 mm) and M (Micro-silica) and the number after it indicates the percentage of using this material as a substitute in concrete. For example, the P10F5 plan represents the amount of 10% glass powder instead of cement and 5% fine rubber 0 to 5 mm instead of fine aggregate concrete in the reference plan, or the P10C5M10 plan represents the amount of 10% glass powder instead of cement and 5% coarse rubber 5 to 10 mm instead of coarse aggregate and 10% micro-silica replaces cement again. In Table 6, the materials and specifications of the mixing plans are stated.
Plan Symbol | Type of Glass replaced | Glass (%) | Type of Rubber replaced | Rubber (%) | Micro-silica (%) | Fine | Coarse (Gravel) | Cement | Glass Powder | Glass Crumb | Rubber | Micro-silica | Water | * SP | ** SP/C (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sand | 3/8" | 3/4" | ||||||||||||||
Kg/m3 | ||||||||||||||||
Reference | - | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | 958 | 253 | 509 | 425 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 175 | 0 | 0 |
P10F5 | Powder | 10 | Fine | 5 | 0 | 910 | 253 | 509 | 382.5 | 42.5 | 0 | 19.5 | 0 | 175 | 0.62 | 0.14 |
P10C5 | Powder | 10 | Coarse | 5 | 0 | 958 | 240 | 484 | 382.5 | 42.5 | 0 | 15.5 | 0 | 175 | 0.62 | 0.14 |
P10B5 | Powder& Crumb | 10& 5 | - | 0 | 0 | 910 | 253 | 509 | 382.5 | 42.5 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 175 | 0.62 | 0.14 |
P10F5M10 | Powder | 10 | Fine | 5 | 10 | 910 | 253 | 509 | 340 | 42.5 | 0 | 19.5 | 30 | 175 | 1.00 | 0.23 |
P10C5M10 | Powder | 10 | Coarse | 5 | 10 | 958 | 240 | 484 | 340 | 42.5 | 0 | 15.5 | 30 | 175 | 1.00 | 0.23 |
P10B5M10 | Powder& Crumb | 10& 5 | - | 0 | 10 | 910 | 253 | 509 | 340 | 42.5 | 48 | 0 | 30 | 175 | 1.00 | 0.23 |
F5M10 | - | 0 | Fine | 5 | 10 | 910 | 253 | 509 | 382.5 | 0 | 0 | 19.5 | 30 | 175 | 0.62 | 0.14 |
C5M10 | - | 0 | Coarse | 5 | 10 | 958 | 240 | 484 | 382.5 | 0 | 0 | 15.5 | 30 | 175 | 0.62 | 0.14 |
B5M10 | Crumb | 10 | - | 0 | 10 | 910 | 253 | 509 | 382.5 | 0 | 48 | 0 | 30 | 175 | 0.62 | 0.14 |
*Superplasticizer - ** Superplasticizer to cement ratio
2.3. Specifications of beams
⌅The initial plan of concrete beams with FRP and steel rebars were done according to ACI440.1R-15 (4242. ACI 440.1R15. (2015). Guide for the plan and construction of concrete reinforced with FRP bars. Farmington Hills. Michigan.
) and ACI 318-19 (4343. ACI 318-19 (2019). Building code requirements for structural concrete. American Concrete Institute (ACI).
) standards, respectively. 13 concrete beams with dimensions of 650×150×150 mm3 (width 150 mm, height 150 mm and length 650 mm) are reinforced with
three groups of GFRP, SGFRP and steel rebars, and their concretes are
made from 10 different mixing plans, including normal concrete and
concretes contain rubber, glass and micro-silica. Beams are named as
B-GF (Beams reinforced with GFRP rebars), B-SGF (Beams reinforced with
SGFRP rebars) and B-St (Beams reinforced with steel rebars). The number
after them indicates the type of concrete. The specifications of the
beams and their type of concrete are stated in Table 7 and in Figure 5.
The supports of all concrete beams are designed to simulate simply
supported beam conditions where both ends are free to rotate about an
axis perpendicular to the length of the beam. Figure 5 shows the geometric details and dimensions of the designed beams.
No. | Beams Symbol | Section (mm) | Type of Rebar | Rebars | Stirrups | Concrete Mixing Plans |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B-GF-1 | b150*h150 | GFRP | 4Ф10mm | Steel-Ф8mm | Reference |
2 | B-GF-2 | b150*h150 | GFRP | 4Ф10mm | Steel-Ф8mm | P10F5 |
3 | B-GF-3 | b150*h150 | GFRP | 4Ф10mm | Steel-Ф8mm | P10C5 |
4 | B-GF-4 | b150*h150 | GFRP | 4Ф10mm | Steel-Ф8mm | P10B5 |
5 | B-GF-5 | b150*h150 | GFRP | 4Ф10mm | Steel-Ф8mm | P10F5M10 |
6 | B-GF-6 | b150*h150 | GFRP | 4Ф10mm | Steel-Ф8mm | P10C5M10 |
7 | B-GF-7 | b150*h150 | GFRP | 4Ф10mm | Steel-Ф8mm | P10B5M10 |
8 | B-GF-8 | b150*h150 | GFRP | 4Ф10mm | Steel-Ф8mm | F5M10 |
9 | B-GF-9 | b150*h150 | GFRP | 4Ф10mm | Steel-Ф8mm | C5M10 |
10 | B-GF-10 | b150*h150 | GFRP | 4Ф10mm | Steel-Ф8mm | B5M10 |
11 | B-SGF-1 | b150*h150 | SGFRP | 4Ф10mm | Steel-Ф8mm | Reference |
12 | B-St-1 | b150*h150 | Steel | 4Ф10mm | Steel-Ф8mm | Reference |
13 | B-SGF-1-2 | b150*h150 | SGFRP | 4Ф10mm | Steel-Ф8mm | Reference |
2.4. Making concrete specimens
⌅The construction and molding of the studied concrete specimens were done according to ASTM C192 (4444.
ASTM C192/C192M-19 (2019). Standard practice for making and curing
concrete test specimens in the laboratory. American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0192_C0192M-19.
) and ASTM C172 (4545.
ASTM C172/C172M-17 (2017). Standard practice for sampling freshly mixed
concrete. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0172_C0172M-17.
) standards. Specimens were cured according to ASTM C511 (4646.
ASTM C511-21 (2021). Standard specification for mixing rooms, moist
cabinets, moist rooms, and water storage tanks used in the testing of
hydraulic cements and concretes. American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0511-21.
)
standard for 28 days. To make concrete specimens, first, gravel and
part of water are poured into the mixer. The mixer is turned on and sand
and rubber (if any), cement, micro-silica (if any) and glass powder (if
any) and the rest of the water are added. Mixing and addition of
Superplasticizer continues according to schedule. The concrete made in
the mixer is poured into the mold and the vibration stage is done with a
vibrating table. After 24 hours, the specimens are removed from the
mold and placed in the curing tank for 28 days. After that, the
specimens are removed from the curing tank and the desired tests are
performed on them. Due to the fact that the addition of rubber, glass
and micro-silica reduces the workability of concrete, Superplasticizer
has been used to obtain a suitable slump for concrete molding. Part of
the steps of making the specimens is shown in Figure 6.
3. TESTS AND RESULTS
⌅Slump test on fresh concrete, compressive strength and bending strength tests and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images have been performed on the specimens.
3.1. Slump test
⌅This test was done based on the ASTM C143 (4747.
ASTM C143/C143M-20 (2020). Standard test method for slump of
hydraulic-cement concrete. American Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0143_C0143M-20.
) standard. The results of the slump test of all mixing plans, with a standard deviation of ±3 mm, are shown of Figure 7. According to this diagram, the slump is suitable in all plans and according to the standard.
3.2. Compressive strength test
⌅The
compressive strength test was performed on cylinder specimens with
dimensions of 150 × 300 (diameter 150 mm, height 300 mm), similar to the
ASTM C39 (4848.
ASTM C39/C39M−21 (2021). Standard test method for compressive strength
of cylindrical concrete specimens. American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0039_C0039M-21.
)
standard. In this research, there are 10 mixing plans, the compressive
strength of each plan is made from the average of three specimens. The
results of the compressive strength of the mixing plans are given in Figure 8 and Table 8.
Plan Symbol | Compressive Strength (MPa) | Compressive Strength Variations (%) |
---|---|---|
Reference | 39 | 0 |
P10F5 | 28.5 | -26.92 |
P10C5 | 34.5 | -11.53 |
P10B5 | 30 | -23.07 |
P10F5M10 | 36 | -7.69 |
P10C5M10 | 42.5 | +8.97 |
P10B5M10 | 37 | -5.12 |
F5M10 | 35 | -10.26 |
C5M10 | 39 | 0 |
B5M10 | 36 | -7.69 |
The
results show that the replacement of rubber in concrete has reduced the
strength of concrete. But the replacement of fine rubber has caused a
further decrease in compressive strength. The compressive strength of
the P10F5 plan has decreased by 27% due to the presence of fine
aggregate rubber, and the P10B5 plan has decreased by 23% due to the
presence of 5% glass crumb instead of fine concrete aggregate. The P10C5
plan, in which coarse rubber is replaced by coarse concrete aggregates,
has a 11.5% reduction in compressive strength compared to the reference
plan, which is probably due to the better granularity in terms of
rubber size of this mixture compared to other mixing plans. These
results are similar to previous research (3838.
Sgobba, S.; Borsa, M.; Molfetta, M.; Carlo Marano, G. (2015) Mechanical
performance and medium-term degradation of rubberized concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 98, 820-831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.095.
, 4949. Ganjian, E.; Khorami, M.; Maghsoudi, A. (2009) Scrap-tyre-rubber replacement for aggregate and filler in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 23, [5], 1828-1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.09.020.
, 5050.
Pacheco-Torgal, F.; Ding, Y.; Jalali, S. (2012) Properties and
durability of concrete containing polymeric wastes (tyre rubber and
polyethylene terephthalate bottles): An overview. Constr. Build. Mater. 30, 714-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.047.
).
The addition of micro-silica to concrete has increased the compressive
strength, and this is due to the chemical effect of micro-silica as a
highly reactive pozzolanic substance in concrete, as well as the
physical effect of micro-silica in filling the voids between particles
in concrete components (5151. Güneyisi, E.; Gesoglu, M.; Ozturan, T. (2004) Properties of rubberized concretes containing silica fume. Cem. Concr. Res. 34 [12], 2309-2317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.005.
, 5252.
Gesoglu, M.; Guneyisi, E. (2007) Strength development and chloride
penetration in rubberized concrete with and without rubberized silica
fume. Mater. Struct. 40, 953-964. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9279-0.
).
As can be seen, the compressive strength of the P10C5M10 plan, which
contains micro-silica, glass powder and coarse rubber, has increased by
about 9% compared to the reference plan, and the compressive strength of
the C5M10 plan, which contains micro-silica and coarse rubber, has the
same compressive strength as the reference plan. Adding micro-silica to
mixing plans with glass powder along with fine rubber and glass crumb
has increased the compressive strength by 26%, and in the plan
containing glass powder with coarse rubber has increased the compressive
strength by 23%. The replacement effect of glass crumb was better than
fine rubber in concrete, and this may be due to the less flexibility of
glass crumb compared to fine rubber, or because of the presence of
silica in glass crumb and its inclusion in the hydration reaction of
concrete. By comparing similar mixing plans with glass powder and with
micro-silica separately, it is clear that the replacement of
micro-silica has a better effect and this can be due to the complete
reaction of micro-silica in concrete compared to glass powder in the
hydration process. In mixing plans containing rubber, the compressive
strength is higher in all mixing plans containing coarse rubber than
fine rubber. The weight of concrete with rubber and glass has decreased
by about 2% compared to the reference concrete.
3.3. Bending strength test
⌅Four-point
bending test (three-point loading) was performed to determine the
bending strength using a simple beam according to the ASTM C78 standard (5353.
ASTM C78/C78M−22 (2022). Standard test method for flexural strength of
concrete (using simple beam with third-point loading). American Society
for Testing and Materials (ASTM). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0078_C0078M-22.
)
on the specimens of the manufactured beams. LVDT (Linear Variable
Differential Transformer) has been used to record the displacement under
the beam. This test has been done on all beam specimens. The beams were
loaded with two concentrated loads spaced 75 mm from the mid-span,
creating a shear span of 200 mm on both sides. The specimens were loaded
continuously and without shock. Loading was applied at a constant rate
up to the breaking point. Loading was applied by displacement control at
a speed of 1 mm/min.
3.3.1. Force-Displacement response
⌅The results of the force displacement response of the bending strength test are shown in the form of four groups of different mixing plans and different rebars in Figures (9-12)Figures (9, 10, 11, 12). For a better comparison of the results, B-GF-3 beam as a reference beam is placed in all figures. Fractures on the diagrams indicate the cracks created in the concrete during force and displacement increase. As it is clear in Figure 9, the bending behavior of all three beams is almost similar. The slope of the beam diagram reinforced with steel rebar is higher in the middle part. This could be due to the ductile behavior of steel rebar compared to GFRP rebar and similar behavior of steel rebar in the range between yield strength and ultimate strength. The corresponding displacement of ultimate force in all three rebars is close to each other. In Figure 10, the initial behavior of the beams is almost similar and they have the same slope. The B-GF-3 beam, which recorded a higher ultimate force in this group, has a greater displacement in failure force. This is due to the presence of glass powder and coarse rubber in the concrete of this beam. The amount of ultimate force in B-GF-2 and B-GF-4 beams are close to each other and they differ by about 3%, and it is similar to the B-GF-1 reference beam, but the failure in B-GF-4 beam happened earlier and had a higher force growth. According to Figure 11, B-GF-6 beam has recorded the highest ultimate force and displacement in all mixing plans, which shows the simultaneous effect of glass powder, coarse rubber and micro-silica in concrete. The slope of the beam diagram of B-GF-7 is slightly higher than the others, which is due to the presence of glass crumb in this mixing plan. The difference in ultimate force and displacement in B-GF-5 and B-GF-7 beams is about 6% and 23%, respectively, and shows the difference in the behavior of fine rubber and glass crumb in concrete. As can be seen of Figure 12, the B-GF-9 beam, whose concrete contains micro-silica and coarse rubber, has 19% and 15% more ultimate bending force than the B-GF-8 and B-GF-10 beams, respectively, and it is also 19% more compared to the B-GF-1 reference beam. The upward slope of the diagrams is almost the same in all the beams, and the displacement of the B-GF-9 beam is more than all the beams, and the B-GF-10 beam is broken with less displacement. In comparing the replacement of glass powder and micro-silica to concrete mixtures with recycled materials, the effect of micro-silica has been 3% better on average. Of course, the maximum displacement in the ultimate bending force is greater in beams containing glass powder than micro-silica.
3.3.2. Ultimate bending force
⌅The results of the bending force of the bending strength test are shown of Figure 13.
According to this diagram, the B-SGF-1 beam reinforced with SGFRP rebar
has a higher bending strength of 3.5% and 5.5%, respectively, than the
B-GF-1 and B-St-1 beams with GFRP and steel rebars. This increase in
bending strength compared to beam with GFRP rebar is due to the presence
of sand on the surface of the rebar which creates greater adhesion and
strength, and when compared to beam with steel rebar it is due to the
higher ultimate tensile strength of SGFRP rebar. The B-GF-1 beam has a
higher bending strength than the B-St-1 beam, and this is due to the
higher ultimate tensile strength of the GFRP rebar compared to steel.
The B-GF-3 beam has an 17.5% increase in bending strength compared to
the reference beam with the same rebar (B-GF-1). This shows that the
replacement of glass powder and coarse rubber in concrete has increased
the bending strength, which is probably due to the tensile strength of
replaced rubber and its proper adhesion to concrete, as well as the
filling of small pores by glass powder that have not entered the
reaction. The B-GF-2 beam also showed a 3% decrease and the B-GF-4 beam
was equal to the reference beam in bending strength. Therefore, glass
powder along with fine rubber reduces the bending strength and glass
powder along with glass crumb does not reduce the bending strength
compared to the reference beam. This could be due to the difference in
the physical nature of fine rubber and glass crumb. Glass crumb have
higher density and higher compressive strength than fine rubber. The
hardness of glass crumb also causes more adhesion to concrete. By adding
10% of micro-silica to the mixing plans, there has been a great
increase in bending strength and this is consistent with previous
research (2727.
Erfan, A.M.; Hassan, H.E.; Khalil, M.H.; El-Sayed, T.A. (2020) The
flexural behavior of nano concrete and high strength concrete usingGFRP. Constr. Build. Mater. 247, 1188664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118664.
, 3030.
El-Mandouh, M.A.; Kaloop, M.R.; Hu, J.W.; Abd El-Maula, A.S. (2022)
Shear strength of nano-silica high-strength reinforced concrete beams. Mater. 15 [11], 3755. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15113755.
).
This increase in bending strength in the B-GF-6 beam is 36% compared to
the reference beam and 16% compared to the B-GF-3 beam, which contains
the same plan without micro-silica. B-GF-5 and B-GF-7 beams showed a 28%
and 25% increase in bending strength, respectively, compared to B-GF-2
and B-GF-4 beams, which are similar to the same mixing plans but without
micro-silica. The replacement of micro-silica due to the physical and
chemical effects mentioned and coarse rubber due to its elastic nature
and shape, along with glass powder in concrete, has increased the
bending strength. The replacement of micro-silica in mixing plans
without glass powder has increased the bending strength. Compared to the
reference beam, the B-GF-9 beam shows an increase of 18.5% and the
B-GF-10 beam also indicates an increase of about 3.5% in bending
strength. The B-GF-8 beam, which contains fine rubber and micro-silica,
had the same bending strength as the reference beam.
3.3.3. Failure mode
⌅In general, the cracks are formed in the bending region of the beam and after the force exceeds the tensile strength of concrete. These cracks expand and propagate upward with increasing load. Next, with increasing load, new cracks are created in the shear zone.
The cracks of beams with normal concrete were initially bending, and after reaching the ultimate force and increasing displacement, they appeared in shear. The propagation of cracks in beams containing coarse rubber is seen more uniformly. The width of the cracks at the ultimate force was smaller in the beams containing rubber, and the bending behavior of the beams containing coarse rubber was better. It can be said that the presence of rubber, especially coarse rubber, in concrete acts as fasteners with different thicknesses that are distributed in the beam sections and reduce the width of the cracks. In the beams containing glass crumb, the shear cracks appear with greater length and width. In general, by applying force to the beams, bending cracks were first created, and with increasing force and displacement, shear cracks appeared and spread in the beams.
3.3.4. Ductility
⌅Ductile materials are materials that can withstand loads in high strains. For reinforced concrete members, ductility is the load-carrying ability to undergo large inelastic deformations before the member fails. On the other hand, the combination of fully elastic tensile behavior of FRP rebars along with the brittle performance of concrete creates a member lacking ductility with brittle failure. One approach to compensate the ductility of reinforced concrete beams with FRP reinforcements is to add or replace materials such as rubber to concrete.
The highest
displacement in ultimate force in concrete beams is related to beams
containing coarse rubber. The displacement of B-GF-3, B-GF-6, and B-GF-9
beams, which all have coarse rubber, was 29%, 54%, and 21% higher than
the reference beam B-GF-1, respectively. Beams containing fine rubber
had more displacement than the reference beams, so it showed an increase
of 19% in the B-GF-5 beam. These results are also consistent with
previous research (2424.
Eisa, A.S.; Elshazli, M.T.; Nawar, M.T. (2020) Experimental
investigation on the effect of using crumb rubber and steel fibers on the
structural behavior of reinforced concrete beams. 252, 119078. Constr. Buid. Mater.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119078.
, 2626.
Ismail, M.K.; Hassan, A.A.A. (2017) An experimental study on flexural
behaviour of large-scale concrete beams incorporating crumb rubber and
steel fibres. j. Eng. Struct. 145, 97-108. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.018.
).
Adding or replacing elastic materials such as rubber to concrete
creates non-brittle and flexible concrete. The reason for the increased
ductility in these beams can be the flexibility of the rubber itself
when applying force and its proper tensile capacity before separating
from the surrounding concrete. The replacement of micro-silica in
similar mixtures has increased displacement, and its highest amount is
in beam B-GF-6 with an increase of 19.5%. The displacements of beams
containing glass crumb were also similar and on average were about 6%
less than the reference beam B-GF-1. The inflexibility of glass crumb,
which is a brittle material, has reduced displacement.
In general, the addition of glass powder and micro-silica to mixtures containing recycled rubber has helped to improve ductility. The displacement of the center of the span in the ultimate force of the tested beams is shown of Figure 14.
3.3.5. Modulus of Rupture
⌅When an element is subjected to bending stress, it applies both tensile and bending forces to an element. This issue leads to uneven distribution of forces among its fibers. The fibers that are at the surface of the element bear the most forces, as a result, they are subject to failure or breakage more than other fibers.
Calculation of modulus of rupture is very important in structural mechanics. This index improves the design of structural elements such as beams, flexural members, shafts, etc. This index helps to know the materials and their characteristics and also predicts the resistance and stability of the elements. This modulus is affected by mixing ratios, size and amount of aggregate used and other factors of sample making.
The modulus of rupture is calculated using the results of the bending test based on the ASTM C78 standard and according to the loading conditions and the fracture position on the tensile surface of the beam, based on Equation [1]:
where:
R = modulus of rupture, MPa,
P = maximum applied force indicated by the testing machine, N,
b = average width of specimen, mm, at the fracture,
d = average depth of specimen, mm,
a = average distance between line of fracture and the nearest support measured on the tension surface of the beam, mm.
The results obtained for the modulus of rupture in the tested beams are shown in Figure 15. The results show that the highest modulus of rupture is related to the B-GF-6 beam, which contains glass powder and micro-silica along with coarse rubber, and it is about 36% higher than the similar reference beam. Considering the effect of the type of aggregates and materials used in concrete on the modulus of rupture, the presence of coarse rubber with high tensile strength, as well as the effect of glass powder and micro-silica in increasing the compressive strength and bending strength of concrete, can be factors in increasing the modulus of rupture in this beam. The lowest one is related to the beam with GFRP rebar with concrete containing fine rubber and glass powder, which has a difference of 2% compared to the similar reference beam. This can be due to the lower adhesive surface of fine rubber to concrete and the lower tensile and compressive strength of concrete made from it compared to coarse rubber. In the beams that contain glass crumb, the B-GF-7 beam has the highest modulus of rupture, which is about 25% higher than the similar reference concrete. In the beams with fine rubber composition, the B-GF-5 beam has the highest modulus of rupture, which is about 23% higher than the similar reference concrete. In both the latter cases, this increase is due to the presence of micro-silica and glass powder in their concrete mixing plans and their effect in increasing the bending strength of the beams.
3.3.6. Comparison of three-point bending test and four-point bending test of beams with composite rebars
⌅In
this section, a three-point bending test (center-point loading) was
performed to determine the bending strength of a simple beam according
to the ASTM C293 standard (5454.
ASTM C293/C293M−16 (2016). Standard test method for flexural strength
of concrete (using simple beam with center-point loading). American
Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0293_C0293M-16.
). LVDT was used to record the displacement under the beam. As shown in Figure 16,
this beam is loaded with a force in the middle of the span and creates a
shear span of 275 mm on each side. The force application conditions and
loading speed were completely similar to the four-point bending test.
This test was performed on one of the beams made with reference concrete
and reinforced with SGFRP rebar (B-SGF-1-2) and compared with the same
specimen under the four-point bending test (B-SGF-1). The results showed
that the ultimate bending force in the beam in three-point bending test
was 6% more than the four-point bending test. The amount of
displacement in the ultimate bending force was also 23% higher. The
behavior of this beam was completely bending and no shear cracks were
seen in it. As the force increased, a crack first appeared in the middle
of the beam and then extended upwards. The width and depth of the crack
increased until the rupture occurred. The results of both bending test
are shown of Figure 17.
3.4. Evaluation of beams with FRP rebars after bending loading
⌅As it is clear in Figure 18, the GFRP rebar is a rupture in this part of the concrete, and the separation or pulling out of the rebar from the concrete is not seen. Therefore, it can be concluded that the adhesion on the surface of GFRP rebar and concrete is suitable. Another point of this Figure is the shear failure of the GFRP rebar, which clearly shows the weakness of these rebars.
Figure 19 shows the specimen of the concrete beam with SGFRP rebar under bending test. As can be seen, the sand coating remains on the rebar. Adhesion of SGFRP rebar surface to concrete is suitable and pulling out of the rebar from inside the concrete is not observed. In general, the performance of SGFRP rebar is better than GFRP rebar.
3.5. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images
⌅Scanning electron microscope imaging was done to investigate the microstructure characteristics of concrete. Figure 20 shows microscopic images of normal concrete specimens, concrete with fine rubber and coarse rubber, respectively.
Calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) is the main adhesive in cement and concrete made from it, and it starts to form from the initial stages of cement hydration, and gradually the cement becomes dense. In Figure 20 (a), hydration products such as C-S-H gel and calcium hydroxide (C-H) crystals in concrete can be seen. Concrete in this part has a homogeneous texture and no large holes are observed in it. In a part of concrete, needle-shaped ettringite crystals are also seen. Ettringite is the mineral name for calcium sulfoaluminate which is commonly found in Portland cement concrete. Sources of calcium sulfate, such as gypsum, are intentionally added to Portland cement to moderate initial hydration reactions to prevent rapid setting. Figure 20 (b) shows that the adhesion between fine rubber and concrete is suitable, but in some parts, cracks caused by the application of force can be seen. These cracks occurred in two areas. One in the rubber itself and the other in the transfer surface between the rubber and the concrete adhesive. Of course, in fine rubber, separation occurred more in the Interfacial Transition Zone (ITZ). Figure 20 (c) also shows good adhesion between coarse rubber and concrete. The texture of the concrete in this part is very uniform and large holes and porosity are not seen. In specimens with coarse rubber, the adhesion of rubber and concrete mortar was better after applying force.
The image of the glass grain in the concrete that has not yet fully reacted is shown in Figure 21. Part of the glass powder and silica in it reacts in the long term and increases the concrete strength.
4. CONCLUSIONS
⌅In this research, the bending behavior of reinforced concrete beams containing recycled glass, rubber and micro-silica with composite rebars (GFRP, SGFRP) and steel rebar has been investigated. Concrete beams with different mixing plans and rebars were made and then subjected to four-point bending test. The investigated variables included the type of rebar, the size of the replacement rubber, the size of the replacement glass, and the type of combination of glass, rubber, and micro-silica. The effects of these variable on the force-deformation behavior, crack pattern, modulus of rupture, and ductility of the beam specimens were investigated. Investigating the microstructure characteristics of concrete containing recycled materials has been done by scanning electron microscope imaging (SEM).
The general results of the research are as follows:
-
The larger the size of the replacement rubber (5-10 mm), the more effective it will be in reducing the workability of concrete.
-
In general, adding glass powder with rubber with dimensions of 5 to 10 mm has reduced the compressive strength less than rubber with dimensions of 0 to 5 mm, and adding micro-silica to these mixing plans increases the compressive strength even more than the reference concrete.
-
Beams reinforced with GFRP and SGFRP composite rebars showed higher bending strength than steel rebars.
-
It can be concluded that adding glass powder and coarse rubber to concrete increases the bending strength by 17.5%.
-
Substituting micro-silica in mixing plans with glass powder has greatly increased the bending strength. Substituting micro-silica in mixing plans containing rubber compensates for the reduction in strength due to the presence of rubber. The effect of micro-silica replacement was slightly better compared to glass powder in similar mixing plans.
-
Substitution of glass powder and rubber, especially coarse rubber in concrete mixtures, causes more displacement in the ultimate bending force in beams under bending, which increases to 29% in the best cases. The replacement of micro-silica in similar mixtures increases the ductility and the highest amount of this increase is 19.5%. Replacing glass crumb instead of sand in concrete reduces ductility by about 28%.
-
The low shear strength of FRP rebars, which is one of the weak points of these rebars, was lower in beams reinforced by sand-blasted rebars.
-
In general, addition or replacement of materials such as rubber and glass in the concrete mix can increase the ultimate bending capacity and displacement, and these provide more warning before failure.
-
The highest modulus of rupture has been recorded in the mixing plans that include glass powder and micro-silica. Its highest value has an increase of 36% compared to the reference concrete beam.
-
In general, in the survey of concrete microstructure, the adhesion of rubber and concrete surface was suitable. In concretes containing fine rubber, breakage and separation of the rubber can be seen. In the concretes containing coarse rubber, there were more fractures in the rubber itself, which can be one of the reasons for the increased bending strength of these specimens.