Influence of aggregate and supplementary cementitious materials on the properties of hydrated lime (CL90s) mortars


  • S. Pavía Dep. of Civil Engineering, Trinity College
  • M. Aly Dep. of Civil Engineering, Trinity College



Mortar, Lime, Pozzolan, Physical properties, Mechanical properties


Hydrated lime is a historic material currently used in conservation. It hardens slowly by carbonation slowing construction however, supplementary cementitious materials accelerate hardening enhancing strength. Hydrated-lime mortars with rice husk ash–RHA-; ground granulated blastfurnace slag–GGBS- and increasing amounts of two aggregates were studied. Increasing aggregate lowered strength as interfacial zones proliferate; it lowered hygric properties and raised water demand. Aggregate content/composition didn’t affect the high water retention. For the higher aggregate contents (90 days), limestone mortars are c.20% stronger than silica mortars while the (1:1) silica sand mortars are 56% stronger in flexion. Additions increased strength with little impact on hygric properties. GGBS increased strength c.six times. RHA increased strength with little impact on hygric properties due to its great specific surface and high water-demand increasing porosity. GGBS and RHA properties ruling hydrate production and the kinetics of the pozzolanic reaction are considered partially responsible for the mortar property variation.


Download data is not yet available.


Vicat, L. (1837) A practical and scientific treatise on calcareous Mortars and Cements. John WealePubl, Reprinted Donhead 1997.

Lanas, J.; Alvarez J.I. (2003) Masonry repair lime-based mortars: Factors affecting the mechanical behavior. Cem. Concr. Res. 33, 1867-1876.

Holmes, S.; Wingate M. (1997) Building with lime: a practical introduction. ITDG, London.

PavÌa, S.; Toomey B. (2008) Influence of the aggregate quality on the physical properties of natural feebly-hydraulic lime mortars. Mat. Struct. 41: 559-569.

Massazza, F. (2002) Properties and applications of natural pozzolans. In: Bensted J, Barnes JP (eds) Structure and performance of cements. Spon Press, London. PMid:12718941

Massazza, F. (2007) Pozzolana and pozzolanic cements. In: Hewlett PC (ed) Lea s chemistry of cement and concrete, 4th edn. Elsevier, UK, 471-602.

PavÌa, S.; Walker, R.; Veale, P.; Wood, A. (2014). Impact of the Properties and Reactivity of Rice Husk Ash on Lime Mortar Properties. J. Mat. Civ. Eng. 26(9).

Walker, R.; PavÌa, S. (2010) Behaviour and Properties of Lime-Pozzolan Pastes. Proc. 8th Int Masonry Conference, International Masonry Society, Dresden, 353-362.

Walker, R.; PavÏa S. (2011) Physical properties and reactivity of pozzolans, and their influence on the properties of lime-pozzolan pastes. Mat. Struct. 44, 1139-1150.

Singhania, N. P. (2004). Rice Husk Ash. The Institute of Concrete Technology Newsletter, The Engineering Council (UK), Issue 55. PMCid:PMC3451328

Billong, N.; Melo, U. C.; Kamseu, E.; Kinuthia, J. M.; Njopwouo, D. (2011) Improving hydraulic properties of lime-ice husk ash (RHA) binders with metakaolin (MK). Construc. Build. Mat. 25 [4], 2157-2161

Isikdag, B.; Topcu I. B. (2013) The effect of ground granulated blast-furnace slag on properties of Horasan mortar. Construc. Build. Mat. 40: 448-454.

Tsai, C. J.; Huang, R.; Lin, W. T.; Wang, H. N. (2014) Mechanical and cementitious characteristics of ground granulated blast furnace slag and basic oxygen furnace slag blended mortar. Materials & Design, 60, 267-273.

EN 459-1 (2010) Building lime. Part 1: Definitions, specifications and conforming criteria. European Committee for Standardisation CEN, Brussels.

EN 459-2 (2001) Building lime. Test methods. European Committee for Standardisation CEN.Brussels.

Dubelaar C. W.; Engering S.; van Hees RPJ.; Lorenz H. G. (2003) Lithofacies and petrophysical properties of Portland Basebed and Witbed limestone. Heron Vol 48 N 3.

EN 1015-11 (1999). Methods of test for mortar for masonry. Determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar.

RILEM (1980). Recommended tests to measure the deterioration of stone and assess the effectiveness of treatment methods. Mat. Struct. 13: 175- 253.

UNE 67-027-84. Determinacion de la absorcion de agua. Ladrillos.

EN 1925 (1999). Natural stone test methods. Determination of water absorption coefficient by capillarity.

Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki, P.; Agioutantisb, Z.; Lionakisa, E.; Stavroulakia, M.; Perdikatsisb V.(2013) Physico-chemical and mechanical characterization of hydraulic mortars containing nano-titania for restoration applications. Cem. Concr. Comp. 36, 33-41.

Aly, M.; PavÌa, S. (2016) Effect of limestone aggregate on the properties of natural hydraulic lime mortar (NHL 5). Euro American Congress Rehabend.

Arandigoyen, M.; Perez Bernal J.L.; Bello Lopez M.A.; Alvarez J.I. (2005) Lime-pastes with different kneading water: pore structure and capillary porosity, Appl. Surf. Sci. 252 [5] 1449-1459.

Griffin, I. (2004) Pozzolanas as Additives for Grouts. Studies in conservation 49: 23-34.

Papayianni, I.; Stefanidou, M. (2006) Strength-porosity relationships in Lime-Pozzzolan mortars, Construc. Build. Mat. 20 [9], 700-705.

Lea s chemistry of cement and concrete (2003) ed by P.C. Hewlett. 4th edn. Elsevier, UK.

Benavente, D. (2011) Why Pore Size Is Important in the Deterioration of Porous Stones Used in the Built Heritage. Revista de la Sociedad Española de MineralogÌa; 2011:15.



How to Cite

Pavía, S., & Aly, M. (2016). Influence of aggregate and supplementary cementitious materials on the properties of hydrated lime (CL90s) mortars. Materiales De Construcción, 66(324), e104.



Research Articles