Shear behavior of hollow clay brick masonry wallet coated with short jute fiber reinforced mortar

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2024.374624

Keywords:

Natural fiber, Shear stress, Diagonal compression, Hollow bricks

Abstract


The objective of this study is to present a new method of reinforcing masonry using layers of mortar reinforced with short jute fibers. Mortars were produced with 0%, 2% and 3% jute fibers with cementitious matrices free of calcium hydroxide. The effectiveness of the reinforced mortar was evaluated through diagonal compression tests of hollow ceramic brick masonry prisms. The prisms were coated on both sides. The experimental results demonstrated that the diagonal resistance of the fiber system increased by 28 to 30% and presented greater resistance to elastic deformation during load application, with deformation coefficients 2 and 3 times greater for 2% and 3% of fibers, respectively. Therefore, jute fibers prove to be a sustainable and efficient alternative for masonry reinforcement applications, with maximum applied loads considerably higher than the unreinforced system, in addition to better crack control.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Qamar F, Thomas T, Ali M. 2019. Assessment of mechanical properties of fibrous mortar and interlocking soil stabilised block (ISSB). for low-cost masonry housing. Mater. Construcc. 69(336):e201. https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2019.13418

Choi Y, Park D, Kim S, Hong J. W. 2022. Seismic performance of crack-damaged masonry wall structures via shaking table tests. Struct. 45:2272-2291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.09.120

Yardim Y, Lalaj O. 2016. Shear strengthening of unreinforced masonry wall with different fiber reinforced mortar jacketing. Constr. Build. Mater. 102(1):149-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.095

Petry S, Beyer K. 2015. Limit states of modern unreinforced clay brick masonry walls subjected to in-plane loading. Bull Earthquake Eng. 13:1073-1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9695-9

Khorasani FF, Kabir MZ. 2022. Experimental study on the effectiveness of short fiber reinforced clay mortars and plasters on the mechanical behavior of adobe masonry walls. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 16:e00918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00918

Vintzileou E, Miltiadou-Fezans A. 2008. Mechanical properties of three-leaf stone masonry grouted with ternary or hydraulic lime-based grouts. Eng. Struct. 30(8):2265-2276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.11.003

Kalagri A, Miltiadou-Fezans A, Vintzileou E. 2010. Design and evaluation of hydraulic lime grouts for the strengthening of stone masonry historic structures. Mater Struct. 43:1135-1146. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-009-9572-1

Jorne F, Henriques FMA, Baltazar LG. 2014. Evaluation of consolidation of grout injection with ultrasonic tomography. Constr. Build. Mater. 66:494-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.095

Isfeld AC, Moradabadi E, Laefer DF, Shrive NG. 2016. Uncertainty analysis of the effect of grout injection on the deformation of multi-wythe stone masonry walls. Constr. Build. Mater. 126:661-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.058

Valluzzi MR, Binda L, Modena C. 2005. Mechanical behaviour of historic masonry structures strengthened by bed joints structural repointing. Constr. Build. Mater. 19(1):63-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.036

de Santis S, Ceroni F, de Felice G, Fagone M, Ghiassi B, Kwiecień A, Lignola GP, Morganti M, Santandrea M, Valluzzi MR, Viskovic A. 2017. Round Robin Test on tensile and bond behaviour of Steel Reinforced Grout systems. Compos. B. Eng. 127:100-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.052

de Santis S, de Felice G. 2015. Steel reinforced grout systems for the strengthening of masonry structures. Comp. Struct. 134:533-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.094

Shermi C, Dubey RN. 2017. Study on out-of-plane behaviour of unreinforced masonry strengthened with welded wire mesh and mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 143:104-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.002

Kadam SB, Singh Y, Li B. 2014. Strengthening of unreinforced masonry using welded wire mesh and micro-concrete - Behaviour under in-plane action. Constr. Build. Mater. 54:247-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.033

Sistani Nezhad R, Kabir MZ. 2017. Experimental investigation on out-of-plane behavior of GFRP retrofitted masonry panels. Constr. Build. Mater. 131:630-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.118

Gabor A, Bennani A, Jacquelin E, Lebon F. 2006. Modelling approaches of the in-plane shear behaviour of unreinforced and FRP strengthened masonry panels. Compos. Struct. 74(3):277-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.012

Babaeidarabad S, Arboleda D, Loreto G, Nanni A. 2014. Shear strengthening of un-reinforced concrete masonry walls with fabric-reinforced-cementitious-matrix. Constr. Build. Mater. 65:243-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.116

Carozzi FG, Milani G, Poggi C. 2014. Mechanical properties and numerical modeling of Fabric Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM). systems for strengthening of masonry structures. Comp. Struct. 107:711-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.08.026

Carozzi FG, Poggi C. 2015. Mechanical properties and debonding strength of Fabric Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM). systems for masonry strengthening. Compos. B. Eng. 70:215-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.056

Menna C, Asprone D, Durante M, Zinno A, Balsamo A, Prota A. 2015. Structural behaviour of masonry panels strengthened with an innovative hemp fibre composite grid. Constr. Build. Mater. 100:111-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.051

Messali F, Metelli G, Plizzari G. 2017. Experimental results on the retrofitting of hollow brick masonry walls with reinforced high performance mortar coatings. Constr. Build. Mater. 141:619-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.112

Sandoval OJ, Takeuchi C, Carrillo J, Barahona B. 2021. Performance of unreinforced masonry panels strengthened with mortar overlays reinforced with welded wire mesh and transverse connectors. Constr. Build. Mater. 267:121054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121054

Lucchini S, Facconi L, Minelli F, Plizzari G. 2020. Retrofitting unreinforced masonry by steel fiber reinforced mortar coating: uniaxial and diagonal compression tests. Mater. Struct. 53:144. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01574-w

Facconi L, Fausto M, Vecchio FJ. 2018. Predicting Uniaxial Cyclic Compressive Behavior of Brick Masonry: New Analytical Model. Journal of Structural Engineering. J. Struct. Eng. 144(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001961

Corradi M, Agnetti S, Quintaliani C, Speranzini E. 2024. Experimental investigation on a FRCM bio-composite for sustainable retrofitting of masonry buildings. Compos. Struct. 329:117753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117753

Xu R, Wang Y, Jiang F, Tang C, Yu J. 2024. Experimental and theoretical studies on the out-of-plane behavior of masonry strengthened with engineered cementitious composite. Constr. Build. Mater. 416:135084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135084

Codispoti R, Oliveira DV, Olivito RS, Lourenço PB, Fangueiro R. 2015. Mechanical performance of natural fiber-reinforced composites for the strengthening of masonry. Compos. B. Eng. 77:74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.021

Pachta V, Chatzineofytou K. 2024. Performance of brick masonry prisms retrofitted with fiber reinforced lime-based grouts. Constr. Build. Mater. 411:134370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134370

Toledo Filho RD, Silva FA, Fairbairn, EMR, Filho JAM. 2009. Durability of compression molded sisal fiber reinforced mortar laminates. Constr. Build. Mater. 23(6):2409-2420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.10.012

Defoirdt N, Biswas S, de Vriese L, Van Acker J, Ahsan Q, Gorbatikh L, Vuure VA, Verpoest I. 2010. Assessment of the tensile properties of coir, bamboo and jute fibre. Compos. Part A Appl. S. 41(5):588-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.01.005

Fidelis MEA, Toledo Filho RD, de Andrade Silva F, Mobasher B, Müller S, Mechtcherine V. 2019. Interface characteristics of jute fiber systems in a cementitious matrix. Cem. Concr. Res. 116:252-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.12.002

Lima PRL, Santos RG, Ferreira SR, Toledo Filho RD. 2014. Characterization and treatment of sisal fiber residues for cement-based composite application. Eng. Agrícola. 34(5):812-825. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162014000500002

Ferreira SR, Silva FA, Lima PRL, Toledo Filho RD. 2017. Effect of hornification on the structure, tensile behavior and fiber matrix bond of sisal, jute and curauá fiber cement based composite systems. Constr. Build. Mater. 139:551-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.004

Ferreira SR, Silva FDA, Lima PRL, Toledo Filho RD. 2015. Effect of fiber treatments on the sisal fiber properties and fiber matrix bond in cement-based systems. Constr. Build. Mater. 101(1):730-740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.120

Jo BW, Chakraborty S, Kim H. 2016. Efficacy of alkali-treated jute as fibre reinforcement in enhancing the mechanical properties of cement mortar. Mater Struct. 49:1093-1104. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0560-3

Silva FA, Filho RDT, Filho JAM, Fairbairn EMR. (2010). Physical and mechanical properties of durable sisal fiber-cement composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 24(5):777-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.10.030

Ahmad J, Arbili MM, Majdi A, Althoey F, Farouk Deifalla A, Rahmawati C. 2022. Performance of concrete reinforced with jute fibers (natural fibers): A review. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/15589250221121871

Majumder A, Stochino F, Frattolillo A, Valdes M, Mancusi G, Martinelli E. 2023. Jute fiber-reinforced mortars: mechanical response and thermal performance. J. Build. Eng. 66:105888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.105888

Saha S, Mohanty T. 2023. Effects on jute fiber and ferrochrome slag as coarse aggregate on mechanical properties of reinforced concrete. Mater. Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.06.382

Kesikidou F, Stefanidou M. 2019. Natural fiber-reinforced mortars. J. Build. Eng. 25:100786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100786

Toledo Filho RD, Ghavami K, England GL, Scrivener K. 2003. Development of vegetable fibre-mortar composites of improved durability. Cem. Concr. Compos. 25(2):185-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00018-5

Bisanda ETN. 2000. The Effect of Alkali Treatment on the Adhesion Characteristics of Sisal Fibres. Appl. Compos. Mater. 7:331-339. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026586023129

FAO. 2023. Jute, kenaf, sisal, abaca, coir and allied fibres Statistical bulletin 2022. Rome.

Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (CONAB). 2023. Análise mensal Juta-Malva 2023. Retrieved from https://www.conab.gov.br.

Data Bridge Market Research. 2021. Global natural fibre textile market - industry trends and forecast to 2028. Materials & Packaging, Global. Retrieved form https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-natural-fibre textile-market.

ASTM C1557-20. 2020. Standard test method for tensile strength and young's modulus of fibers.

ASTM C618-03. 2017. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete.

Lima PRL, Toledo Filho RD. 2008. Use of metakaolin to improve the durability of sisal fiber- cement based composites. Ambiente Construído. 8(4):7-19. https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ambienteconstruido/article/view/5723.

ABNT NBR 13276. 2016. Mortars applied on walls and ceilings - Determination of the consistence index.

ABNT NBR 13278. 2005. Mortars Applied on walls and ceilings - Determination of the specific gravity and the air entrained content in the fresh stage.

ABNT NBR 9778. 2009. Hardened mortar and concrete -Determination of water absorption by immersion - Void index and mass specific.

Madhavi K, Vinay GN, Renuka Devi MV, Basutkar SM. 2019. Shear behavior of brick masonry strengthened with jute fiber reinforced composite. Mater. Today Proc. 46(10):4746-4751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.307

Lee G, Park JH, Pham KVA, Lee CH, Lee K. 2021. Experimental investigation of traditional clay brick and lime mortar intended for restoration of cultural heritage sites. Appl. Sci. 11(13):6228. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136228

Arisoy B, Ercan E, Demir A. 2015. Strengthening of brick masonry with PVA fiber reinforced cement stucco. Constr. Build. Mater. 79:255-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.093

ABNT NBR 15270-3. 2005. Ceramic components - Part 3: Structural and non-structural ceramic blocks - Test methods.

ASTM E519/E519M - 15. 2022. Standard test method for diagonal tension (shear. in masonry assemblages. ASTM Committee C15 on Manufactured masonry units.

RILEM TC-76-LUM. 1994. Diagonal tensile strength tests of small wall specimens, RILEM recommendations for the testing and use of constructions materials, 488-9. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482271362

Fidelis MEA, de Andrade Silva F, Toledo Filho RD. 2014. The Influence of fiber treatment on the mechanical behavior of jute textile reinforced concrete. Key Eng. Mater. 600:469-474. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.600.469

Ferreira SR, Martinelli E, Pepe M, de Andrade Silva F, Toledo Filho RD. 2016. Inverse identification of the bond behavior for jute fibers in cementitious matrix. Compos. B. Eng. 95:440-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.097

Savastano Júnior H, Agopyan V. 1997. Microstructure X performance of composites reinforced with vegetable fibers. In. São Paulo: Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo.

Cottrell JA, Ali M, Tatari A, Martinson DB. 2023. Effects of Fibre Moisture Content on the Mechanical Properties of Jute Reinforced Compressed Earth Composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 373:130848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130848

Santos DOJ. 2020. Development of lightweight sandwich panels with faces made of cementitious composites reinforced with short sisal fibers and a core made of rice husk bioconcrete, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 144p.

Daramola OO, Balogun OA. Adediran AA, Saka SO, Oladele IO, Akinlabi ET. 2021. Tensile, flexural, and morphological properties of jute/oil palm pressed fruit fibers reinforced high density polyethylene hybrid composites. Fibers. 9(11):71. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib9110071

Sodoke FK, Toubal L, Laperrière L. 2016. Hygrothermal effects on fatigue behavior of quasi-isotropic flax/epoxy composites using principal component analysis. J. Mater. Sci. 51(24):10793-10805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0291-z

Kumar Verma Y, Kumar Singh A, Paswan MK, Kumar Sonker P. 2023. Importance of functionalized jute fibers in the field of Nano cellulose for the preparation of biodegradable nano composites. Mater. Today Proc. 80(1):254-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.01.031

Baheti V, Abbasi R, Militky J. 2012. Ball milling of jute fibre wastes to prepare nanocellulose. World J. Eng. 9(1):45-50. https://doi.org/10.1260/1708-5284.9.1.45

Sinha E, Rout SK. 2009. Influence of fibre-surface treatment of jute fibre and its composite. Bull. Mater. Sci. 32:65-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-009-0010-3

Fidelis MEA, Pereira TVC, Gomes ODFM, de Andrade Silva F, Toledo Filho RD. 2013. The effect of fiber morphology on the tensile strength of natural fibers. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2(2):149-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2013.02.003

Murugan RB, Gayke A, Natarajan C, Haridharan MK, Murali G, Parthiban K. 2018. Influence of Treated Natural Jute Fiber on Flexural Properties of Reinforced Concrete Beams. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 7(3.12):148-152. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.12.15906

Santa-Maria H, Duarte G, Garib A. 2004. Experimental investigation of masonry panels externally strengthened with CFRP laminates. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. 1627:1627.

Yu, JH, Park JH. 2020. Investigation of steel fiber-reinforced mortar overlay for strengthening masonry walls by prism tests. Appl Science. 10(18):6395. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186395

Mezrea PE, Ispir M, Balci IA, Bal IE, Ilki A. 2021. Diagonal tensile tests on historical brick masonry wallets strengthened with fabric reinforced cementitious mortar. Struct. 33:935-946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.04.076

Elgwady MA, Lestuzzi P, Badoux Dynamic M. 2002. In-plane behaviour of URM wall upgraded with composites. 3rd International Conference on Composites in Infrastructure. San Francisco, CA, USA.

Khaleel S, Madhavi K, Basutkar SM. 2021. Mechanical characteristics of brick masonry using natural fiber composites. Mater. Today Proc. 46:4817-4824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.319

Dong Z, Deng M, Dai J, Ping M. 2021. Diagonal compressive behavior of unreinforced masonry walls strengthened with textile reinforced mortar added with short PVA fibers. Eng. Struct. 246:113034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113034

Published

2024-05-23

How to Cite

Farias, L., Lima, P. ., & Toledo Filho, R. . (2024). Shear behavior of hollow clay brick masonry wallet coated with short jute fiber reinforced mortar. Materiales De Construcción, 74(354), e347. https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2024.374624

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Funding data