Geopolymer with brick and concrete demolition constructions waste

C. Parra; I. Miñano; M. Calabuig; F. Benito; J. M. Mateo; E. Carrión; C. Ruiz

doi:10.3989/mc.2024.392424

Autores/as

C. Parra Architecture and Building Technology Department, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2063-4604
I. Miñano Architecture and Building Technology Department, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8863-8759
M. Calabuig Architecture and Building Technology Department, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0622-7229
F. Benito Innovation Department. Urdecon Constructions https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0082-7900
J. M. Mateo Architecture and Building Technology Department, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7948-8059
E. Carrión Architecture and Building Technology Department, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3642-2875
C. Ruiz Innovation Department. Urdecon Constructions https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1600-4914

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2024.392424

Palabras clave:

Geopolímeros, Residuos de construcción, Sostenibilidad

Resumen

La producción de materiales de construcción impacta los recursos no renovables por la extracción excesiva de materias primas y el consumo de combustibles fósiles. Este estudio explora alternativas al hormigón con cemento Portland mediante la valorización de residuos de construcción y demolición (RCD), como ladrillos y hormigón armado. Se propone sustituir o eliminar el clínker mediante geopolímeros e incorporar áridos reciclados derivados de RCD. Se desarrollaron hormigones sostenibles, desde geopolímeros con 0% de clínker y 50% de árido reciclado hasta mezclas con diferentes proporciones de RCD para aplicaciones estructurales. Los resultados revelan que los geopolímeros con 100% de escoria granulada de alto horno (GBFS) alcanzan propiedades comparables al hormigón convencional. No obstante, mezclas con ladrillo y hormigón reciclado presentan menor resistencia debido a la baja molaridad y al uso de áridos reciclados. El módulo elástico aumenta con 100% GBFS, pero disminuye menos del 10% al incorporar RCD. En vigas, los momentos últimos disminuyen un 30% con 25% RCD, mientras las mezclas con ladrillo mejoran la absorción de energía.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Energy Technology Perspectives 2015 – Analysis - IEA. Accessed: Nov. 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-technology-perspectives-2015

Van Jaarsveld JSJ, Van Deventer JSJ, Lorenzen L. 1997. The potential use of geopolymeric materials to immobilise toxic metals: Part I. Theory and applications. Miner. Eng. 10(7):659–669.

Mahmoodi O, Siad H, Lachemi M, Dadsetan S, Sahmaran M. 2021. Development of normal and very high strength geopolymer binders based on concrete waste at ambient environment. J. Clean. Prod. 279:123436.

Komnitsas K, Zaharaki D, Vlachou A, Bartzas G, Galetakis M. 2015. Effect of synthesis parameters on the quality of construction and demolition wastes (CDW) geopolymers. Adv. Powder Technol. 26(2):368–376.

Murillo LM, Delvasto S, Gordillo M. 2017. A study of a hybrid binder based on alkali-activated ceramic tile wastes and Portland cement. In: Sustainable and Nonconventional Construction Materials Using Inorganic Bonded Fiber Composites. 2017:291–311.

Bassani M, Tefa L, Russo A, Palmero P. 2019. Alkali-activation of recycled construction and demolition waste aggregate with no added binder. Construct. Build. Mater. 205:398–413.

Tuyan M, Andiç-Çakir Ö, Ramyar K. 2018. Effect of alkali activator concentration and curing condition on strength and microstructure of waste clay brick powder-based geopolymer. Compos. B. 135:242–252.

Rakhimova N, Rakhimov R. 2015. Alkali-activated cements and mortars based on blast furnace slag and red clay brick waste. Materials & Design. 85:324–332.

Krivenko P, Kavalerova E. 2008. Performance of alkali-activated cements-perspective ways for carbon dioxide emissions reduction. In: 3rd International Symposium. Non-traditional Cement & Concrete, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic, pp. 389–399.

García-Lodeiro A, Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A, Macphee DE. 2010. Effect of calcium additions on N–A–S–H cementitious gels. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93(7):1934–1940.

Puligilla S, Mondal P. 2013. Role of slag in microstructural development and hardening of fly ash-slag geopolymer. Cement Concr. Res. 43:70–80.

Rakhimova NR, Rakhimov RZ. 2019. Reaction products, structure, and properties of alkali-activated metakaolin cements incorporated with supplementary materials – a review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 8(1):1522–1531.

Lampris C, et al. 2009. Geopolymerisation of silt generated from construction and demolition waste washing plants. J. Waste Manag. 29(1):368-373.

Huo W, Zhu Z, Chen W, Zhang J, Kang Z, Pu S, Wan Y. 2021. Effect of synthesis parameters on the development of unconfined compressive strength of recycled waste concrete powder-based geopolymers. Construct. Build. Mater. 292:123264.

Panias D, GiannopoulouI P, Perraki T. 2007. Effect of synthesis parameters on the mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymers. Colloids Surf, A301(1–3):246–254.

Ahmari S, Zhang L. 2012. Production of eco-friendly bricks from copper mine tailings through geopolymerization. Construct. Build. Mater. 29:323–331.

Vafaei M, Allahverdi A. 2019. Strength development and acid resistance of geopolymer based on waste clay brick powder and phosphorous slag. Struct. Concr. 20(5):1596–1606.

Akduman S, et al. 2021. Experimental investigations on the structural behaviors of reinforced geopolymer beams produced from recycled construction materials. Journal of Building Engineering. 41:102776.

Zheng Y, Xiao Y. 2023. A comparative study on strength, bond-slip performance, and microstructure of geopolymer/ordinary recycled brick aggregate concrete. Construct. Build. Mater. 366:130257.

Asadizadeh M, Hedayat A, Tunstal L, Vega JA, Vera, JW, Taboada M. The impact of slag on the process of geopolymerization and the mechanical performance of mine-tailings-based alkali-activated lightweight aggregates. Construction and Building Materials. 411:134347.

Abdalla JA, Rasheed R. 2022. Behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened in flexure using externally bonded aluminum alloy plates. ICSI 2021, Procedia Structural Integrity 37(2022):652–659.

Majid MA, Kadhim AJ, Jawdhari WN, Ali M. 2023. Experimental study on RC beams strengthened in flexure with CFRP-Reinforced UHPC overlays. Eng. Struct. 285:116066.

Dahou Z, Castel A, Noushini A. 2016. Prediction of the steel-concrete bond strength from the compressive strength of Portland cement and geopolymer concretes. Construct. Build. Mater. 119:329–342.

Ronmanazzi V, Leone M, Aiello M, Pecce M. 2022. Bond behavior of geopolymer concrete with steel and GFRP bars. Compos. Struct. 300:116150.

Ahmed H, Jaf D, Yaseen S. 2020. Flexural strength and failure of geopolymer concrete beams reinforced with carbon fibre-reinforced polymer bars. Construct. Build. Mater. 231:117185.

Peng KD, Huang BT, Xu LY, Hu RL, Dai JG. 2022. Flexural strengthening of reinforced concrete beams using geopolymer-bonded small-diameter CFRP bars. Eng. Struct. 256:113992.

Ansari MA, Shariq M, Mahdi F. 2023. Structural behavior of reinforced geopolymer concrete beams – A review. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2023.