Caracterización mecánica de unidades de mampostería de hormigón impresas en 3D con alto contenido de áridos y adiciones minerales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2026.412825Palabras clave:
Agregado, Materiales suplementarios, Eficiencia de la construcción, Albañilería estructural 3DCP, SostenibilidadResumen
El presente estudio tiene como objetivo ampliar el conocimiento sobre mezclas cementosas con bajo contenido de cemento y altos niveles de adiciones minerales y agregados, evaluando su influencia en las propiedades constructivas de elementos impresos representativos de mampostería estructural. Se definieron parámetros y geometrías de impresión que permiten crear estructuras autoportantes, buscando hacer el proceso de construcción más rápido, eficiente y sencillo. En estado endurecido se analizaron la absorción de agua, la resistencia a la compresión y a la flexión en piezas pequeñas, así como la resistencia a la compresión de los bloques 3DCP y la adherencia entre capas. Los resultados obtenidos demuestran que, con los parámetros adoptados en el sistema de impresión utilizado, es posible producir elementos volumétricos de mampostería mediante mezclas con mayor contenido de áridos y sustitución parcial del cemento por masilla caliza y metacaolín, logrando resultados satisfactorios en edificabilidad, resistencia mecánica y eficiencia constructiva.
Descargas
Citas
Olsson NOE, Arica E, Woods R, Alonso J. 2021. Industry 4.0 in a project context: introducing 3D printing in construction projects. Proj. Leadersh. Soc. 2:100033.
Li LG, Xiao BF, Fang ZQ, Xiong Z, Chu SH, Kwan AKH. 2021. Feasibility of glass/basalt fiber reinforced seawater coral sand mortar for 3D printing. Addit. Manuf. 37:101684.
Shahmirzadi MR, Gholampour A, Kashani A, Ngo TD. 2021. Shrinkage behavior of cementitious 3D printing materials: effect of temperature and relative humidity. Cem. Concr. Compos. 124:104238.
Buswell RA, Leal de Silva WR, Jones SZ, Dirrenberger J. 2018. 3D printing using concrete extrusion: a roadmap for research. Cem. Concr. Res. 112:37–49.
Ilcan H, Şahin O, Kul A, Yıldırım G, Şahmaran M. 2022. Rheological properties and compressive strength of construction and demolition waste-based geopolymer mortars for 3D printing. Constr. Build. Mater. 328:127114.
Skibicki S, Pułtorak M, Kaszyńska M, Hoffmann M, Ekiert E, Sibera D. 2022. The effect of using recycled PET aggregates on mechanical and durability properties of 3D printed mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 335:127443.
Villaquirán-Caicedo MA, Fernández-González A, Fernández-García DA, Mejía de Gutiérrez R. 2023. Valorization of a low-quality coal ash, in the preparation of alkali activated inks for applications in 3D additive manufacturing. Constr. Build. Mater. 399:132598.
Dams B, Chen B, Kaya YF, Orr L, Kocer BB, Shepherd P, Kovac M, Ball RJ. 2024. Fresh properties and autonomous deposition of pseudoplastic cementitious mortars for aerial additive manufacturing. IEEE Access. 12:34606–34631.
Lu B, Weng Y, Li M, Qian Y, Leong KF, Tan MJ, Qian S. 2019. A systematical review of 3D printable cementitious materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 207:477–490.
He XB, Fang YK, Peng Y, Shen W, Qiao D, Wang M. 2022. Mortar’s rheological property and workability investigation based on morphology impact factor for graded sand particles. Constr. Build. Mater. 328:126987.
Li T, Nogueira R, de Brito J, Liu J. 2023. Influence of fine aggregate's morphology on mortars' rheology. J. Build. Eng. 63:105450.
Kamakshi TA, Thakur MS, Subramaniam KV. 2024. Formulating printable concrete mixtures based on paste rheology and aggregate content: application to alkali-activated binders. Cem. Concr. Res. 184:107611.
Sotorrío G, Alonso J, Olsson NOE, Tenorio JA. 2021. Printability of materials for extrusion 3D printing technologies: a review of material requirements and testing. Mater. Construcc. 71(344):e267.
Zhang Y, Zhang YS, Liu G, Yang YG, Wu M, Pang B. 2018. Fresh properties of a novel 3D printing concrete ink. Constr. Build. Mater. 174:263–271.
Bayat H, Kashani A. 2023. Analysis of rheological properties and printability of a 3D printing mortar containing silica fume, hydrated lime, and blast furnace slag. Mater. Today Commun. 37:107128.
Provis JL, Duxson P, Van Deventer JSJ. 2010. The role of particle technology in developing sustainable construction materials. Adv. Powder Technol. 21(1):2-7.
Homayoonmehr R, Ramezanianpour AA, Mirdarsoltany M. 2021. Influence of metakaolin on fresh properties, mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of concrete and its sustainability issues: a review. J. Build. Eng. 44:103011.
Chen Y, Li Z, Chaves Figueiredo S, Çopuroğlu O, Veer F, Schlangen E. 2019. Limestone and Calcined Clay Based Sustainable Cementitious Materials for 3D Concrete Printing: A Fundamental Study of Extrudability and Early Age Strength Development. Appl. Sci. 9(9):1809.
Muzenda TR, Hou P, Kawashima S, Sui T, Cheng X. 2020. The role of limestone and calcined clay on the rheological properties of LC3. Cem. Concr. Compos. 107:103516.
Rojo López G, González Fonteboa B, Martínez Abella F, González Taboada I. 2022. Rheology, durability, and mechanical performance of sustainable self compacting concrete with metakaolin and limestone filler. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 17:e01143.
Harbouz I, Rozière E, Yahia A, Loukili A. 2022. Printability assessment of cement based materials based on rheology, hydration kinetics, and viscoelastic properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 325:126810.
Barbosa MS, Anjos MAS, Cabral KC, Dias LS. 2022. Development of composites for 3D printing with reduced cement consumption. Constr. Build. Mater. 341:127775.
Nunes GM, Anjos MAS, Lins ABS, Negreiros AMS, Pessoa L. 2023. Evaluation of the mechanical behaviour of representative volumetric elements of 3DCP masonry mixtures with partial replacement of cement by limestone filler and metakaolin. J. Build. Eng. 78:107650.
ASTM/ISO 52939. 2023. Additive manufacturing for construction — Qualification principles — Structural and infrastructure elements. International Standard, Dec. 2023.
Han XY, Yan JC, Liu MJ, Huo L, Li JL. 2022. Experimental study on large scale 3D printed concrete walls under axial compression. Autom. Constr. 133:103993.
Daungwilailuk T, Pheinsusom P, Pansuk W. 2021. Uniaxial load testing of large scale 3D printed concrete wall and finite element model analysis. Constr. Build. Mater. 275:122039.
Anjos MAS, Nunes GM, Lins ABS, Negreiros AMS, Pessoa L. 2024. Effect of the geometry of representative volumetric masonry elements: experimental and numerical analysis. Digital Concrete 2024 - Supplementary Proceedings, 2024.
Dias LS, Anjos MAS, Barbosa MS, Bezerra UT. 2024. Evaluation of mix design parameters based on basic constitutive relationships for 3DCP printing. Cerâmica 70:eZXBR6170.
ABNT. 2016. NBR 13276: Argamassa para assentamento e revestimento de paredes e tetos – Preparo da mistura e determinação do índice de consistência. Rio de Janeiro.
ABNT. 2005. NBR 13278: Argamassa para assentamento de paredes e revestimento de paredes e tetos – Determinação da densidade de massa e do teor de ar incorporado. Rio de Janeiro.
ABNT. 2014. NBR 12118: Blocos vazados de concreto simples para alvenaria – Métodos de ensaio. Rio de Janeiro: 16.
ABNT. 2005. NBR 13279: Argamassa para assentamento e revestimento de paredes e tetos – Determinação da resistência à tração na flexão e à compressão. Rio de Janeiro.
ABNT. 2011. NBR 7222: Concreto e argamassa – Determinação da resistência à tração por compressão diametral de corpos de prova cilíndricos. Rio de Janeiro.
Wolfs RJM, Bos FP, Salet TAM. 2019. Hardened properties of 3D printed concrete: the influence of process parameters on interlayer adhesion. Cem. Concr. Res. 119:132-140.
Ting GHA, Tay YWD, Qian Y, Tan MJ. 2019. Utilization of recycled glass for 3D concrete printing: rheological and mechanical properties. J. Mater. Cycles Waste: 21:994–1003.
ABNT. 2009. NBR 9778: Argamassa e concreto endurecidos – Determinação da absorção de água, índice de vazios e massa específica. Rio de Janeiro.
ABNT. 2005. NBR 15259: Argamassa para assentamento e revestimento de paredes e tetos – Determinação da absorção de água por capilaridade e do coeficiente de capilaridade. Rio de Janeiro.
Wolfs RJM, Bos FP, Salet TAM. 2018. Correlation between destructive compression tests and non destructive ultrasonic measurements on early age 3D printed concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 181:447-454.
Panda B, Lim JH, Tan MJ. 2019. Mechanical properties and deformation behaviour of early age concrete in the context of digital construction. Compos. Part B Eng. 165:563-571.
Roussel N, Buswell R, Ducoulombier N, Ivanova I, Kolawole JT, Lowke D, Mechtcherine V, Mesnil R, Perrot A, Pott U, Reiter L, Stephan D, Wangler T, Wolfs R, Zuo W. 2022. Assessing the fresh properties of printable cement based materials: high potential tests for quality control. Cem. Concr. Res. 158:106836.
Ollivier J P, Torrenti J M. 2014. A estrutura porosa dos concretos e as propriedades de transporte. In: Ollivier J P, Vichot A (Eds.). Durabilidade do concreto: bases científicas para a formulação de concretos duráveis de acordo com o ambiente. Cascudo O, Carasek H (Ed. trad.). 1. ed. São Paulo: IBRACON: 41–112.
Jaji MB, Zijl G, Babafemi AJ. 2024. Durability and pore structure of metakaolin based 3D printed geopolymer concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 422:135847.
Li C. 2022. Relationship between water absorption and porosity in concrete with limestone powder addition. Struct. Concr. 23(5):3284-3293.
Chen Y, He S, Zhang Y, Wan Z, Çopuroğlu O, Schlangen E. 2021. 3D printing of calcined clay limestone based cementitious materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 149:106553.
Du J, Meng W, Khayat KH, Bao Y, Guo P, Lyu Z, Abu Obeidah A, Nassif H, Wang H. 2021. New development of ultra high performance concrete (UHPC). Compos. Part B Eng. 224:109220.
ABNT. 2016. NBR 6136: Bloco vazado de concreto simples para alvenaria estrutural – Requisitos. Rio de Janeiro.
Lim S, Buswell RA, Le TT, Austin SA, Gibb AGF, Thorpe T. 2012. Developments in construction scale additive manufacturing processes. Autom. Constr. 21:262-268.
Le TT, Austin SA, Lim S, Buswell RA, Law R, Gibb AGF, Thorpe T. 2012. Hardened properties of high performance printing concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 42(3):558-566.
Zhang Y, Zhang YS, She W, Yang L, Liu G, Yang Y. 2019. Rheological and harden properties of the high thixotropy 3D printing concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 201:278-285.
Duan Z, Li L, Yao Q, Zou S, Singh A, Yang H. 2022. Effect of metakaolin on the fresh and hardened properties of 3D printed cementitious composite. Constr. Build. Mater. 350:128808.
Wang Y, Chen M, Zhang T, Zhang M. 2024. Hardening properties and microstructure of 3D printed engineered cementitious composites based on limestone calcined clay cement. Cem. Concr. Compos. 152:105641.
Zareiyan B, Khoshnevis B. 2017. Effects of interlocking on interlayer adhesion and strength of structures in 3D printing of concrete. Autom. Constr. 83:212-221
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
© CSIC. Los originales publicados en las ediciones impresa y electrónica de esta Revista son propiedad del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.
Salvo indicación contraria, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional ” (CC BY 4.0). Consulte la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia. Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario.
No se autoriza el depósito en repositorios, páginas web personales o similares de cualquier otra versión distinta a la publicada por el editor.
